Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 46 to 60 of 81
Thread: Which Tap & Die set to purchase?
-
1st February 2014, 12:47 PM #46
Crikey. I go down to the shed for a couple of hours and another bunch of posts.
Ah, yes, that'll do it. Thanks Michael.
I looked at M6, ¼" and 5/16". In my local hardware, would the garden variety Imperial threads be UNC? Or summink else? Reading another post it's a bit hard to know if they've changed or not in the last little while. One change I have noticed is that since a few months ago none of the local hardwares have a single brass wood screw to show between them.
Ah yup, that's about right Ew, BUT I'd rather find out this stuff before rather than after! It's all good.
Thanks for the link.
-
1st February 2014 12:47 PM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
-
1st February 2014, 12:51 PM #47Cba
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Melbourne
- Age
- 68
- Posts
- 1,417
Yes for some obscure reason Bunnings still sells 55 degree Withworth fasteners - but notice this is only the hot dip Zinc plated variety for outdoor use. To buy a tap or die for these makes no sense, unless you can hot dip galvanize your workpiece afterwards. All other fasteners at Bunnings including high tensile and stainless appear to be either metric or American 60 degrees.
Just why hot dip galvanised Withworth fasteners are still so popular in Australia I do not know. Maybe it is because imported stainless steel fasteners are so overpriced here? Maybe someone knows? Chris
-
1st February 2014, 12:59 PM #48SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Location
- Ballarat
- Age
- 65
- Posts
- 2,659
I normally agree with the majority of what you say Chris but saying "nobody"?? Ummm, I do. Almost everything I make at home (at least) has the Whitworth form.
Saying "Only some antique British threads had 55 degrees.", is correct for American threads as well. Even the American Standard Square Thread has a modified form with a 10 deg included angle.That could almost be confusing.
They also do Acme, Butress etc. I am stretching this a bit I know as it's obvious you are talking about the 'V' form but I had to say something
Gees Chief Tiff, you make it sound like the Whitworth thread form is almost the worst thing to happen to mankind.
Guess it makes me a clown as well Stuart
Phil
-
1st February 2014, 01:08 PM #49
Sorry, have to disagree with that. It was not only the hot dipped galvanised ones, also the standard zinc plated ones. Just try and put a UNC nut on one of the Bunnings (and Mitre 10 and most Oz hardware store) zinc plated bolts and you will find that the thread form is different.
I have had Whitworth taps and dies since Adam was a boy, showing my age here I guess.
In fact until the last year or so you couldn't buy most metric bolts and nuts in a "normal" hardware store you had ot go the specialist bolt places (where most bolts are way cheaper anyway - even the Whitworth ones!)
-
1st February 2014, 01:17 PM #50GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 7,775
And a good thread form it is to. Though granted it doesnt matter for what I make I'm told its better when subjected to fatigue due to the radius at the thread root. Which according to one of my books has been reinvented by the USA as mil spec 8879C for that very reason.........but we are heading out of my depth.
Always room for one more
Stuart
-
1st February 2014, 02:33 PM #51
Not at all; Whitworth was the first common thread with specific standardised sizes; it was a logical and desperately needed outcome of the Industrial Revolution.
It also had a couple of drawbacks: they were notorious for shaking loose under vibration and the shallow angle with rounded root/crest radii were a little awkward to make cutting tools for. A 60 degree angle lends itself to production tooling; this made Unified easier and cheaper to make so naturally it overtook Whitworth. Even in the UK if you want Whitworth threads you have to specifically ask for them as the only market is vintage machinery and very idiosyncratic applications;eg the tripod mount on a camera is still 1/4" whit. General purpose hardware is all metric.
I seriously don't understand why there is such a plethora of whitworth on the market. We appear to be the only country still using it and I get the impression it's down to purely reluctance to accept change. As an example of utter stupidity a couple of years ago I took delivery of a brand new air compressor for work and had to initially pull it apart to mount it in a truck. It was "made" by a very well known Australian seller of industrial compressors; of course the only Australian component was the air receiver and associated fittings. Maybe. Anyway, the compressor itself came from China and used Unified fasteners. The diesel engine that span it came from Italy and was therefore all Metric. No prizes for guessing what thread form was chosen for all the fasteners etc that mounted the whole shebang together.
WRT to drills; the initial hole for tapping obviously has a tolerance depending on diameter, but for say M6-M10 0.1mm either way is too much. The tapping drill for an M8 is 6.8mm; a 6.5mm is way too small and is a pig to cut the thread with and a 7mm gives you a crap sloppy fit. So you need a 6.8mm drill bit. Or a hand sharpened 6mm bit in a hand drill
-
1st February 2014, 03:13 PM #52SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
- Kyabram. Vic
- Posts
- 826
Well one day I am going to make up a project and make my own taps and bolts in a a 7.5 tpi or or .5tpi or other strange thread.. Just to send some poor mug around the twist in the future when he tries to match it; and because my lathe will do it.
Ken I think the heat is giving my evil thoughts.
-
1st February 2014, 03:24 PM #53GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 7,775
Who said anything about 6.5mm? 8-1.25=6.75 try 17/64 and see how you go.
Not so sure 7mm would give to a "crappy sloopy fit"(in fact it shouldnt, the thread form would still be the same. just the thread depth would change. If the app is correct 7mm would give you 73.90% thread depth which is more than good enough for most applications.
Stuart
-
1st February 2014, 03:33 PM #54
It is probably a result of the notorious reluctance by Australian manufacturing companies to invest in new machinery. The company that produced Whitworth bolts here in Oz probably imported those machines pre WWII from the UK and saw no reason to invest in new machinery, until they lost their market to Chinese manufacturers who did invest in new machinery.
A classic case of this was British Tube Mills in Adelaide, established with used machinery imported from the UK pre WWII and run until the 1980s without replacement, when they closed down because they couldn't compete with imported tube from China made on all new machinery that didn't break down 10 times a day and used 1/10 the labour!
How do I know this?
My son did his F&T apprenticeship there and finished (luckily) the year they closed down. He reckoned it was like working in a museum!
-
1st February 2014, 03:59 PM #55.
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Perth
- Posts
- 27,791
I assume we mean M8 (1.25) mm ?
If so I agree.
I use a fair few M8 (1.25) bolts in projects and 7 mm seems to work perfectly well for me, even in Al unless it is thinner than about 3mm and then I use 6.9 mm bits.
FWIW for M8 (1.25) Tubal Cain recommends drill sizes of 7.2 mm for 60% coverage, through to 6.9mm for 80% coverage.
I picked up a few M8 (1) all thread rods a while back and have used some of this stuff for fixing for which I usually use 7.1 mm drills.
-
1st February 2014, 04:01 PM #56
-
1st February 2014, 04:29 PM #57GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- sydney
- Age
- 64
- Posts
- 3,566
This is getting a little anal for a backyarder.
-
1st February 2014, 04:36 PM #58Bushmiller;
"Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"
-
1st February 2014, 04:37 PM #59GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 7,775
-
1st February 2014, 05:46 PM #60
Brett
You certainly have a knack of posting threads that move along quickly . That's those that survive of course . Anyhow I didn't come online to be mischievous .
I just thought I'd add my twopennyworth, which accurately sums up it's value. There is something missing in all this wealth of information.
I know.
There's no pictures . How do you expect me to understand what's going on without pictures. Even my two volume dictionary has pictures (Oxford Illustrated for duffers and other illiterates.)
This was my first set in the orange box plus a few extra taps and dies thrown in. It was a cheapie and is over thirty years old. I have damaged a few taps, mainly in the smaller sizes, but I think I was lucky and I wouldn't recommend anybody buy one of these. There is an exception to that if you are mainly cleaning up old damaged threads. The set was metric and included both coarse and fine metric up to 12mm
Hand Taps 004.jpg
The reason for fine threads is engineering. They are stronger than the coarse threads. As others have said, almost inevitably you come to do a specific job and you don't have the right tap or die. I keep meaning to buy a basic imperial set, but have never quite got around to it. Hence the recommendation to buy a basic set and then supplement as you need. Like this:
Hand Taps 003.jpg
As already stated these will normally come in sets of three, which progressively increase the amount of cut. I think those pictured are P & N.
More recently (ten years ago?) I decided to buy a larger general purpose set. This is it:
Hand Taps 001.jpg
It looks fine, good price (about $100 or so I think) but it has been something of a disaster. The larger taps and dies are reluctant to cut anything harder than Gidgee and this is what can happen to the smaller taps:
Hand Taps 002.jpg
That is not a spiral tap, but is has spiraled . The blank spots in the set above are where the taps broke. Carbon steel for this application only cuts cake.
So more recently again I invested in a HSS set. Small with just the common metric sizes and three taps to each dimension. Again about $100, this time from Carbatec.
Hand Taps 005.jpg
Much better. Then just buy extras as you need them, but that can be quite expensive. I should add that this is not a high end set, but in HSS it is adequate for my limited use.
An example of a custom buy was this from the McJing stand at the last WWW show in Brissy:
Hand Taps 2 003.jpg
30 x 3.5mm tap and die suitable for a lathe headstock. Still unused .
Finally this is a tapping drill. Really it was more about the drill than the application. Lesto made these in the fifties and early sixties before they were bought out by Bosch. (Lesto themselves were famous for pioneering the jigsaw). I rather like them and have two straight drills, a screwdriver and this tapping drill. They all look the same until you get to the business end.
Hand Taps 2 001.jpgHand Taps 2 002.jpg
I haven't had the courage to use it in anger yet.
Ok, that's it. Everybody can have a read now not just the literary geniuses .
Got to get back and work on the cave. 1646hrs: It might have cooled down.
Regards
PaulLast edited by Bushmiller; 1st February 2014 at 08:55 PM. Reason: Forgot to upload the drill pix!
Bushmiller;
"Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"
Similar Threads
-
Possible Purchase
By cqvillas in forum WOODTURNING - GENERALReplies: 18Last Post: 30th July 2012, 08:55 PM -
Possible new saw purchase
By terry arnold in forum TABLE SAWS & COMBINATIONSReplies: 6Last Post: 29th June 2009, 08:16 PM -
Just not my day, another dud purchase
By Gumby in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH WOODWORKReplies: 14Last Post: 29th April 2007, 10:14 PM -
Purchase
By Gingermick in forum BANDSAWSReplies: 7Last Post: 28th April 2005, 02:07 PM