Thanks: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 1 to 15 of 44
Thread: Taster, Arbors and Repeatability
-
7th June 2013, 09:49 PM #1.
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Perth WA
- Age
- 71
- Posts
- 5,650
Taster, Arbors and Repeatability
Things aren't as wonderful as I thought. The Haimer Taster has 4 adjustment screws enabling the precise centring of the device on the machine's spindle. The arbor I machined insitu on the mill last weekend will not provide repeatability. I can painstakingly adjust the screws until I have no needle movement on a 0.0001" DTI indicating off the stylus . Then when the 30 taper arbor is repeatedly removed and replaced in the same marked position in the spindle, the runout varies from 5 to fifteen thou. Demoralising.
I thought I had better check by comparing the runout with the Taster mounted in an ER collet. Installed in a Schaublin chuck and a Rego-Fix collet, there is no needle movement on a half thou indicator when indicating off the Taster's arbor. After centring the Taster, I removed and reinstalled the chuck three times with the same no needle movement results when indicating off the stylus.. Rotating the chuck 180 degrees in the mill spindle resulted in a 0.001" TIR.
I have a problem with the bored insitu arbor. I'm thinking maybe it's not seating properly in the spindle. I'll blue it up tomorrow and hopefully find out what is going on.
Has anyone else encountered this sort of thing?
BT
Taster Woes 002 (Large).JPGTaster Woes 004 (Large).JPG
-
7th June 2013 09:49 PM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Age
- 2010
- Posts
- Many
-
7th June 2013, 10:08 PM #2Dave J Guest
Yeah I agree it sounds like it's a bad taper on the arbour. You might be able to re machine it and need to start again, but if you do machine it I doubt it will be true in the bore and will need re boring again.
You might need to put this one down to a good experiment of boring in the mill.
Dave
-
7th June 2013, 10:48 PM #3Philomath in training
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Location
- Adelaide
- Age
- 59
- Posts
- 3,149
Dave - how can you say such a thing! That arbor cost all of around $10. I can imagine that the taper on a cheap $5 arbor might be out but not an expensive one like that!
Bob, it will be interesting to see the arbor once blued up. I guess the other possibility (although slight) is the hole that the Taster shaft mounts in. If there is a little clearance and the Taster is only secured with 1 grub screw there may be the possibility of some movement. Does wrapping tape around the taster shaft (that is, decreasing any clearance) make it better? I was impressed with the fit of the cutter that came in that arbor - you could feel the cushioning as the air behind it compressed.
Michael
-
7th June 2013, 10:55 PM #4GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 7,775
-
8th June 2013, 01:36 AM #5.
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Perth WA
- Age
- 71
- Posts
- 5,650
The one positive thing about this little adventure is confirmation that the 50 year old spindle runs true. I was fearful that the 13's accuracy might have been in question. This will spur me on to commence work again on the table lowering plate. It's a prick of a thing when projects lose their momentum and sadly I have a few that have.
BT
-
8th June 2013, 09:49 AM #6SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Sydney
- Posts
- 2,340
Good luck with it Bob. My experience is that the blue may not tell you the whole story, it's too thick. If the blue doesn't reveal all, I've had more luck by cleaning it up and then looking at the witness marks on the taper. Mind you my experience is with the shallow morse tapers, so perhaps a faster taper like that may be easier to blue. But it's certainly the same thing with spindles, once you start getting down to it, witness marks are your guide. Are you marking the taper and spindle and placing it in the same location each time?
Pete
-
8th June 2013, 10:31 AM #7
Hi Bob,
I'm wondering if the taper wasn't quite seated properly when you machined it?
As for the blue, if canode/marko is too thick, try a whiteboard marker. Once dry it is very easy to wipe off and much thinner than the spotting compound.
Cheers,
Ew1915 17"x50" LeBlond heavy duty Lathe, 24" Queen city shaper, 1970's G Vernier FV.3.TO Universal Mill, 1958 Blohm HFS 6 surface grinder, 1942 Rivett 715 Lathe, 14"x40" Antrac Lathe, Startrite H225 Bandsaw, 1949 Hercus Camelback Drill press, 1947 Holbrook C10 Lathe.
-
8th June 2013, 11:28 AM #8
...and for really, really fine markings, try using the haze left behind after wiping with metho. I am told that's in the micron neighbourhood...
It's all part of the service here at The House of Pain™
-
8th June 2013, 11:57 AM #9.
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Perth WA
- Age
- 71
- Posts
- 5,650
The tool can only be installed in two positions 180 degrees apart due to the drive dogs (?) on the spindle Pete. I had been replacing the arbor in the same location. Given the soft, free machining nature of the arbor I'm now wondering if it might be a home made ring-in. The machining appears well executed though. It is puzzling.
This could simply end up being as Dave suggests, a demonstration of using the mill for turning. And as I indicated in our email discussion during the week, it was great to get back in the shed and make something even if it does turn out to be a near fruitless exercise.
Bob.
ps. Ew and Gregor, thank you for the suggestions. I often use an Artline permanent marker for marking out. The ink has a thickness that renders it useless for bluing but for testing rough fits it works well enough. I will obtain a whiteboard marker.
The metho haze will be kept in mind. I like it GQ.
-
8th June 2013, 12:37 PM #10GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 7,775
Hi BT,
I'm not sure you need to worry about wafer thin blue just yet(though I'm sure you'll get there), you're chasing thous and tens of thous, not tenths.
I'm wondering if the tapers are even meeting. the arbor looks longer and looks to be deeper into the spindle. If it was a ding in the arbor, shouldn't you still get repeatability*? (as opposed to the taper angle be wrong)
Your dogs are part of the spindle?
Stuart
*repeatability better than 10 thou I mean
-
8th June 2013, 12:54 PM #11.
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Perth WA
- Age
- 71
- Posts
- 5,650
Integral Stu, A precleaned photo.
(The spindle is double ended, 30 taper one end, P20 taper the other, hence the draw bar sitting there)
I'll head up the shed now for hopefully a discovery session.
-
8th June 2013, 01:07 PM #12GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 7,775
-
8th June 2013, 01:16 PM #13.
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Perth WA
- Age
- 71
- Posts
- 5,650
A bit more about it here Stu should you desire to be informed - https://www.woodworkforums.com/f65/sc...0/#post1166884
-
8th June 2013, 02:05 PM #14SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Sydney
- Posts
- 2,340
Ah yes sorry, my brain really must be mush today. I was just picturing in my mind how I do my tapers. I can see the "ears" would be a bit of a PIA in some ways, as I was going to suggest carefully rolling it along a surface plate, but that ain't gunna work!
I don't think it will take much up in the spindle to throw it out at the tool end.
-
8th June 2013, 04:20 PM #15
Hi BT,
You probably did this already, but check for burrs and dust or other contamination... inconsistency is usually down to not seating properly, did it blue consistently?
Regards
Ray
Similar Threads
-
Haimer 3d Taster - What would you do?
By variant22 in forum METALWORK FORUMReplies: 21Last Post: 5th February 2013, 10:12 AM -
Arbors, Blades, Washers & a Cheeky Question
By two40 in forum TABLE SAWS & COMBINATIONSReplies: 11Last Post: 30th December 2012, 11:35 PM -
Tasty Taster
By Anorak Bob in forum METALWORK FORUMReplies: 9Last Post: 21st January 2012, 05:55 PM -
Waterstone tests: a taster from Stu of toolsfromjapan.com
By rsser in forum SHARPENINGReplies: 75Last Post: 30th January 2011, 08:24 AM -
MT-3 slitting saw arbors
By hitachi230 in forum METALWORK FORUMReplies: 7Last Post: 3rd June 2008, 12:16 PM