Thanks Thanks:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 51
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Victoria, Australia
    Age
    74
    Posts
    6,132

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BaronJ View Post
    Like you I get virtually no variation from one end of the table to the other.
    Hmm... go back a couple of posts... I already pointed out the fallacy of this method.

    But since the mill itself can't be adjusted, you'd have to tram the vise with shims. Setup an indicator in the spindle so that it sweeps the vise jaws as the spindle rotates, Adjust until you get no change as the spindle is rotated.

    Ray

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #32
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    7,775

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RayG View Post
    But since the mill itself can't be adjusted, you'd have to tram the vise with shims. Setup an indicator in the spindle so that it sweeps the vise jaws as the spindle rotates, Adjust until you get no change as the spindle is rotated.
    Not so sure thats going to do anything........ if the tram is out sliming the vice wont fix that.................... I think. sure the vice will be trammed to the spindle but it wont be parrallel to the axis.....but the mill will still cut the same wont it?

    Stuart

  4. #33
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Victoria, Australia
    Age
    74
    Posts
    6,132

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stustoys View Post
    Not so sure thats going to do anything........ if the tram is out sliming the vice wont fix that.................... I think. sure the vice will be trammed to the spindle but it wont be parrallel to the axis.....but the mill will still cut the same wont it?

    Stuart
    Yes, it won't matter that the table ways are at an angle to the spindle axis. So long as the vise is trammed to the spindle axis and the work is parallel to the vise.

    Ray

  5. #34
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    7,775

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RayG View Post
    Yes, it won't matter that the table ways are at an angle to the spindle axis. So long as the vise is trammed to the spindle axis and the work is parallel to the vise.

    Ray
    I'm not seeing it.
    If the spindle is out of tram and you move the vice to match the spindle, its now out of wack to the X axis. The "look" of the top face of the work is the results of the spindle angle to the X axis...... the angle of the vice and work piece wont change that.
    Am I misunderstanding what you are trying to do?

    Stuart

  6. #35
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Victoria, Australia
    Age
    74
    Posts
    6,132

    Default

    Hmm... ok take the vise away, for a minute. tilt the table 45 degrees.. ( if you could ) measure the distance from the cutter to the table. now run the table back and forwards. Does the distance between the cutter and the table change?

    Ray

  7. #36
    Ueee's Avatar
    Ueee is offline Blacksmith, Cabinetmaker, Machinist, Messmaker
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Canberra
    Age
    40
    Posts
    4,467

    Default

    Hi Ray,
    Do the same thing but leave the table flat and tilt both the head and vice 45 deg, they will be in tram with each other. But, the cut will be deeper at on end than the other (well at 45 you would just make a mess of everything). The only way to tram the head is to make sure the spindle center line is perpendicular to the X axis ways.

    I would be judiciously scraping/filing the column to the base to get it in tram. The only other thing i can think of is shim it on the corners and inject something in the gap like an epoxy, or metal putty etc. Fill the damn column with concrete while your at it to add a little mass.

    When fly cutting watch for more trailing cut as the leading cut comes off the work. This shows flex in the machine and a sign that for test cuts at least you need to go slower. The mill being in tram however will not change how parallel a machine part is-only how the cutter works and how square milled edges are, how square drilled holes are etc.

    Ew
    1915 17"x50" LeBlond heavy duty Lathe, 24" Queen city shaper, 1970's G Vernier FV.3.TO Universal Mill, 1958 Blohm HFS 6 surface grinder, 1942 Rivett 715 Lathe, 14"x40" Antrac Lathe, Startrite H225 Bandsaw, 1949 Hercus Camelback Drill press, 1947 Holbrook C10 Lathe.

  8. #37
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Victoria, Australia
    Age
    74
    Posts
    6,132

    Default

    Hi Ewan,

    Not quite....

    The answer to the previous question you are thinking of is no change in the distance from the cutter to the table as the table goes back and forth in X.

    Let me take it step by step...

    Ok, now put the vise back on the table, still at 45 degrees, and clamp up a block of material in the vise, and take an X axis cut. Now clamp up the part you wish to work on parallel to the cut surface and you can machine as if the machine was trammed.

    Now, what happens if instead of the block of material, I machined the same cut off the vise... any work I clamp to the vise parallel to the jaws will be in tram to the spindle.

    Final step, instead of milling the vise, ( and ruining it's resale value ) I shim it instead by the same amount I would have removed had I milled it.

    The only reason I'd even consider tramming the vise instead of the table, is on this mill it's not adjustable... hope that's confused everyone..

    Ray

  9. #38
    Ueee's Avatar
    Ueee is offline Blacksmith, Cabinetmaker, Machinist, Messmaker
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Canberra
    Age
    40
    Posts
    4,467

    Default

    I think i follow but if the head is not trammed it remains not trammed, no matter what you do with the vice. If the LHS of the cutter is lower then the RHS, the LH will cut and the right wont, no matter if you are milling parallel or not....

    Ew
    1915 17"x50" LeBlond heavy duty Lathe, 24" Queen city shaper, 1970's G Vernier FV.3.TO Universal Mill, 1958 Blohm HFS 6 surface grinder, 1942 Rivett 715 Lathe, 14"x40" Antrac Lathe, Startrite H225 Bandsaw, 1949 Hercus Camelback Drill press, 1947 Holbrook C10 Lathe.

  10. #39
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Victoria, Australia
    Age
    74
    Posts
    6,132

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ueee View Post
    I think i follow but if the head is not trammed it remains not trammed, no matter what you do with the vice. If the LHS of the cutter is lower then the RHS, the LH will cut and the right wont, no matter if you are milling parallel or not....

    Ew
    No both sides will be the same height in relation to the work.. imagine we used a big facemill to machine the top of the vise jaws, then clamped our work parallel to the jaws we just cut, both sides of the cutter are the same height in relation to the work.

    Ray

  11. #40
    Ueee's Avatar
    Ueee is offline Blacksmith, Cabinetmaker, Machinist, Messmaker
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Canberra
    Age
    40
    Posts
    4,467

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RayG View Post
    both sides of the cutter are the same height in relation to the work.
    Only if you cut it with the Y axis. Tilt the head to 45 again, now make the cut with the Y, the vise jaws are at 45 and trammed. If you make the cut with the X though only one side of the cutter cuts, but your cut is concave.

    Ew
    1915 17"x50" LeBlond heavy duty Lathe, 24" Queen city shaper, 1970's G Vernier FV.3.TO Universal Mill, 1958 Blohm HFS 6 surface grinder, 1942 Rivett 715 Lathe, 14"x40" Antrac Lathe, Startrite H225 Bandsaw, 1949 Hercus Camelback Drill press, 1947 Holbrook C10 Lathe.

  12. #41
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    7,775

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RayG View Post
    Ok, now put the vise back on the table, still at 45 degrees, and clamp up a block of material in the vise, and take an X axis cut. Now clamp up the part you wish to work on parallel to the cut surface and you can machine as if the machine was trammed.
    Nope.
    You may(should in fact) get a part that is parrallel*......but the tram still wont be right.
    Changing the angle between the X axis and the top of the vice jaws doesnt change the angle between the X axis and the spindle. and thats tram.

    *though I'm not sure what barons problem is.

    Stuart

  13. #42
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Victoria, Australia
    Age
    74
    Posts
    6,132

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stustoys View Post
    Nope.
    You may(should in fact) get a part that is parrallel*......but the tram still wont be right.
    Changing the angle between the X axis and the top of the vice jaws doesnt change the angle between the X axis and the spindle. and thats tram.

    *though I'm not sure what barons problem is.

    Stuart
    Yes, you are correct, the error is still there, and there's no easy way to get rid of it.. but you can machine a part "as if the mill was trammed"

    I'm still thinking about what happens to Y... Ewan has confused me... I don't think nodding was mentioned earlier was it?

    Ray

  14. #43
    Ueee's Avatar
    Ueee is offline Blacksmith, Cabinetmaker, Machinist, Messmaker
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Canberra
    Age
    40
    Posts
    4,467

    Default

    Not thinking about nodding, just using the Y to mill the vice jaws.....

    Ew
    1915 17"x50" LeBlond heavy duty Lathe, 24" Queen city shaper, 1970's G Vernier FV.3.TO Universal Mill, 1958 Blohm HFS 6 surface grinder, 1942 Rivett 715 Lathe, 14"x40" Antrac Lathe, Startrite H225 Bandsaw, 1949 Hercus Camelback Drill press, 1947 Holbrook C10 Lathe.

  15. #44
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    7,775

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RayG View Post
    .. but you can machine a part "as if the mill was trammed"
    No it wont........Doesnt matter what you do with the vice....the surface of the workpiece will exactly the same in relation to the X axis....only the bottom of the work piece will have moved a little.

    I'm thinking you're talking about getting it to cut parrallel. I'm talking about tram.

    Stuart

  16. #45
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Victoria, Australia
    Age
    74
    Posts
    6,132

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stustoys View Post
    No it wont........Doesnt matter what you do with the vice....the surface of the workpiece will exactly the same in relation to the X axis....only the bottom of the work piece will have moved a little.

    I'm thinking you're talking about getting it to cut parrallel. I'm talking about tram.

    Stuart
    Yes, we are talking about different things..

    I agree, by definition you can't tram it wihout changing the X axis or the spindle axis, but you can get it to cut parallel. ( well maybe, with this mill, I'd not be too sure... )

    Ray

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Another "Glue for cutting board" question...
    By surfdabbler in forum GLUE
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 3rd June 2013, 10:50 PM
  2. eBay: How long can you "Save" the "Draft"-listing of an item you want to sell?...
    By Batpig in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH WOODWORK
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 22nd January 2011, 06:04 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •