Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,795

    Default Peltor Optime III earmuf specs

    When started using big chainsaws back in 2007 because of my poor hearing I looked into ear muffs and the Peltor 10Hx series seemed to be amongst the best so I bought a 2 sets of 10HAs (over the head), one set for the shed, and one for my van so that I have them with when I take out the chainsaw.

    It turns out that the 10HA did not sit all that comfortably with the face shield I was using when usings the chainsaw. So I bought a set of 10HBs (behind the neck) and found they worked really well because they clip over the shield's headband adjustment button at the back of the head so that they hold each other on my wonkily shaped head. I found these so good I bough a second pair for the shed.

    I haven't used big chainsaws for a while but I'm about to do some more chainsaw work so thought I should maybe see what else is out there or at least get a new set of Peltors.

    I couldn't find any 10Hx series but I did see a Peltor called Optime III. Anyway I got myself set and through I would plot the dB reduction ratings at the various frequencies for the Optime III and compare them against the old Peltor 10Hx series.

    I also found some noise reduction data for a Peltor muff called a Bullseye which is a well known shooting muff.
    From what I can see the Optime III (Black line) is pretty close to the Bullseye (green line)

    Both the Optime III and Bullseye appear slightly better than the 10Hx series muffs at frequencies above about 1 kHz (which is where my hearing deficits are).
    OTOH the 10Hx series are slightly better below 1kHz
    Along with muffs I also usually wear ear plugs which help a bit with added attenuation in the lower frequency range.

    Screen Shot 2022-03-16 at 1.13.51 pm.png

    Some of this is moot because the most real attenuation any muffs or ear plugs can achieve is around 36 dB because above that level, sound is increasingly conducted by the skull to the inner ear. If you need greater attenuation than this then you will need to go for an Astronaut type helmet.

    The other issue is of course fit, so eyeglasses and beards come into play. It takes a little while for the foam surround to conform around my eyeglass arms but I can usually hear when this has been achieved.

    To achieve these high dB ratings these muffs all have quite high side pressure so are that comfortable when you first wear them. Over time I've found I am sort of used to them but I'm grateful when I can take them off.

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    5,125

    Default

    Makes me wonder what the frequencies are in a regular workshop.

    Bandsaws, tables saws, sanders, that kind of thing.

    I've seen notices of their volumes, but never their frequency, which is interesting.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,795

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by woodPixel View Post
    Makes me wonder what the frequencies are in a regular workshop.
    Bandsaws, tables saws, sanders, that kind of thing.
    I've seen notices of their volumes, but never their frequency, which is interesting.
    Here we go - some quick and dirty measurements.
    Ignore the text above the plots - just look at the graphs

    1: Free running TS - no dust extraction.
    Peak noise is in the 1 -3kHz range. Bout 80dB
    Remember the ear is most sensitive to 1kHz so that why it's so annoying.
    ts2.jpg

    2: Wood lathe free wheeling with DC on
    This is ALL DC noise - gets up to 85 dB at 500Hz.
    Ducting is different than sander so the DC noise is not necessarily the same.

    lathe2.jpg

    3: 1m x 150 mm Belt sander free wheeling
    This machine requires the DC to be running or it won't run
    Broad spectrum noise (combo of DC and sand belt noise) reaching 80dB across the range
    Most of the higher end noise is belt noise.
    Sdander2.jpg


    5" angle grinder grinder free wheeling
    Highest frequency in the 4-5kHz range ~100dB
    angleg3.jpg


    Can do some spectrum while actually cutting and sanding if you are interested.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    South Carolina USA
    Posts
    21

    Default

    Fantastic information, Bob.

    Would you please tell me the frequency of my wife's voice? That is the most annoying for me.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    5,125

    Default

    Its funny you should mention that Newboy.

    My loving daughter is getting towards being a Psych. She always bounces her work off me to tidy it up. (My theory is that she thinks I am thick. If I can comprehend it, well...)

    One of the most fascinating things I read was exactly your comment. I'll find the info, but the gist is that women's voices are smack bang in the range that most blokes loose their hearing in.

    So, wifey complaining he is increasingly ignoring her? Nope, he literally doesn't hear her.

    Edit - there was another which mentioned the specific frequencies that women's voices are pitched and (guessing) it being highly distracting or disruptive (??? Can't recall exact effect. 'll dig it up).



    BTW BobL, isn't it interesting that the muffs don't protect so well at 2khz. Would this be so one can still hear being spoken too? For safety?

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,795

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Newboy View Post
    Fantastic information, Bob.

    Would you please tell me the frequency of my wife's voice? That is the most annoying for me.
    SWMBO has quite a husky, low-frequency voice. I only notice it when she is talking with other women.
    Doesn't seem to change the annoyance factor though

    BTW BobL, isn't it interesting that the muffs don't protect so well at 2khz. Would this be so one can still hear being spoken too? For safety?​
    Could be, but in practice is doesn't matter - as long as the dB reduction is >36dB that's about as good as you are going to get. After that the skull will start conducting sound from the source direct to the inner ear. ie bypasses the ear canal And any muff.

    The human ear is most sensitive at around 1kHz but age related hearing losses are usually at higher frequencies and those that end top muffling speech are in the 3-4 kHz range. These are important in differentiating between consonants/sounds like "c", "t", "sh" and "ch" etc

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    10,826

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by woodPixel View Post
    Makes me wonder what the frequencies are in a regular workshop.

    Bandsaws, tables saws, sanders, that kind of thing.

    I've seen notices of their volumes, but never their frequency, which is interesting.
    I wrote about the noises in mine: http://www.inthewoodshop.com/Powered...yWorkshop.html

    Here is a re-print ...


    Noise levels in my workshop








    It seems appropriate to open the Power section with a word on safety, in this case hearing safety. I suffer from Tinnitus, and this is a result of decades of ignoring my hearing and workshop dangers. Fortunately, my Tinnitus is not too bad, and I have learned to dissociate from it. However, I would rather not have it. Take caution about the dangers of machine noise!!


    A European Union directive on noise, issued in 2015, requires companies across the Continent to provide hearing protection for workplaces with a noise level higher than 80 dB. From 85 dB on, employees are required to wear hearing protection.


    I measured several of the machines in my workshop. This was inspired by the recently completed installation of a new table saw and new hoses to the existing dust collector. Perhaps you can use this thread as a database/baseline for your machines and power tools to guide your own safety.

    Noise levels were measured using an iPhone app,
    SPLnFFT. The measured ambient noise in my workshop was 40dB and my speech level 52-54dB. Listening to my favourite Internet jazz station (Jazz 24) via the workshop stereo produced as similar 52dB. Noise levels were recorded within 1m of the running machine.



    Hand planing was a higher-than-expected 68dB.




    Machines

    The three main large machines I have:

    *
    Hammer A3-31 Jointer-Thicknesser (silent head): 76dB …...This is tolerable for conversation
    *
    Hammer N4400 Bandsaw: 78dB …...This is borderline – frankly, just too loud.
    *
    Hammer K3 Tablesaw (12" blade combo blade by Stark): 93dB …... crazy loud!










    Nova Voyager drill press (above): 44dB at 500 rpm; 48dB at 1000 rpm; 63dB at 2000 rpm.


    The Nova Saturn lathe (below): 50dB at 500 rpm; 56dB at 1250 rpm; 63dB at 2500 rpm; 66dB at 5000 rpm.





    Both the Nova machines are comfortable without hearing protection.

    The
    Festool CT26E vacuum cleaner produced 75dB with the 27mm hose connected. Too loud for me.








    Carbatec 2HP dust collector. This is fitted with a 1micron cannister filter via an Oneida Super Dust Deputy cyclone. Originally, this machine was connected by 4" hoses, and the noise level was subjectively LOUD (I did not measure it, but I would guesstimate around 95dB).



    Changing to 5" hose appears to have dropped the level. Previously I could not switch it on without hearing protection (if one must, but I do not recommend). Now it was possible to talk over the machine! With 5" hoses, the DC measured 77dB.


    I wonder if 6" hoses would lower the sound levels even more? Currently 5" is the largest I can go to without modifying the ports of the machines. I plan to upgrade all the hoses to rigid PVC when I eventually get a more powerful machine with a larger impellor.


    My current dust control is supplemented with a 1/3 h.p. HAFCO overhead air cleaner, (and by opening the garage doors and blowing out the dust).


    At the lowest speed, the sound level is 59dB, which makes an audible hum. The second speed is quite noticeable at 62dB, and the highest speed produces 64dB, which is intrusive. I tend to run this at the highest (noisiest) level at the end of a day, using a 4-hour timer. This does a decent job of scrubbing the air. It is just too noisy to have on generally, even with machines masking this, since the machines may not remain on very long.





    Power Tools




    The Carbatec 8" half-speed bench grinder (on the right) with 2 CBN wheels measured 67dB. This is reasonably comfortable without hearing protection.





    The Rikon on the left, now set up with buffing wheels on both sides, produced 63dB. Comfortable.


    Visit www.inthewoodshop.com for tutorials on constructing handtools, handtool reviews, and my trials and tribulations with furniture builds.

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    10,826

    Default

    The Carbatec 9x6" ¾ h.p. disk/belt sander combo measured 77 dB. I prefer to use my ear muffs here.











    Elu 177e based router table 85dB with the router in the table …







    and 88dB when it was handheld (the big ‘un on the left) ...







    This is comparable with the Mirka Ceros ROS, also 85dB …









    Circular saws, like routers, are hideously noisy. This 7 ¼” 1300w (1 ¾ h.p.) NRG saw produces 97dB – the loudest tool in the workshop!







    One needs to also factor in that the handheld power tools are used in conjunction with a vacuum cleaner, which adds its own noise.




    Hearing Protection


    My preferred earmuffs are the 3M Peltor, which lower the sound levels by 30dB. I have a couple of pairs at each end of the workshop.


    Elipse dust mask and 3M Peltor


    I also have a pair of Sensgard ZEMs. These are effective, but not as comfortable. On the other hand, they fold up and are the ones I will take to wood shows or other settings, where I need to demonstrate tool use and am situated near loud machines.





    I tend to argue against the use of hearing protection which includes music or phone connection. The last thing we need when using machines is to be distracted from the task at hand … otherwise you might lose it.



    Regards from Perth

    Derek



    November 2020

    Visit www.inthewoodshop.com for tutorials on constructing handtools, handtool reviews, and my trials and tribulations with furniture builds.

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Redlands area, Brisbane
    Posts
    1,490

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by derekcohen View Post


    I tend to argue against the use of hearing protection which includes music or phone connection. The last thing we need when using machines is to be distracted from the task at hand … otherwise you might lose it.
    Up to a point...

    For those of us with tinnitus (and I know you are a fellow sufferer) the silence when the DC stops with hearing protection on can be unbearable. For that reason, I have recently started using Bluetooth connected hearing protection.

    Because the sound quality is so poor of the units I've so far used, I tend to play just noise. Meaning a combination of white/pink/brown noise. There are now numerous smart phone apps that can do this for little to zero cost.

Similar Threads

  1. Looking for Good Deals Peltor Muffs
    By Kidbee in forum SAFETY
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 7th March 2018, 05:08 AM
  2. Neckband Peltor earmuffs
    By gonty in forum SAFETY
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 21st May 2009, 09:29 PM
  3. shelf specs
    By new growth in forum WOODWORK - GENERAL
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 4th May 2009, 01:45 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •