Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 1 to 6 of 6
Thread: Aircell insulation vs anticon
-
16th December 2007, 04:30 PM #1Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- South Coast NSW
- Posts
- 73
Aircell insulation vs anticon
Hi all,
I just got a price for the aircell insulation at $360.00 for 1350 x 22.5
I understand that aircell performs as well as batts and acts as a sarking also...
Anticon - is anticon a similar product? could i use anticon in place of batts and sarking?
Does anybody know approximately how anticon compares in price?
And if using cliplcok roofing, it has quite high furrow ridges things, would this be detrimental to the whole anti condensation effectiveness of anticon as their may be air gaps between the wool and the high ridges of the cliplock??
thanks
-
16th December 2007 04:30 PM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
-
16th December 2007, 04:53 PM #2SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
- Durong Qld
- Age
- 63
- Posts
- 849
You can buy aircell on ebay for 218 (NSW fella too)
-
16th December 2007, 07:09 PM #3Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- South Coast NSW
- Posts
- 73
bloody ripper!
-
16th December 2007, 07:16 PM #4
Here is the price for 12m2 roll.
http://buybuildingsupplies.com.au/r2...ket-p-949.html
I would prefer to use Anticon rather than Aircell. Like I said in another thread you will find Aircell harder to lay without damaging it as apposed to Anticon.
-
18th December 2007, 08:25 AM #5
-
18th December 2007, 12:06 PM #6
Make it work.
That is the way it is used. What Zongatron says about condensation forming in the ribs of the Kliplok doesn't happen. Condensation is formed by warm air underneath coming in contact with the cold steel. Because the insulation is under the Kliplok the steel remains cold underneath and no condensation forms.