Thanks: 
Likes: 
Needs Pictures: 
Picture(s) thanks:
Results 16 to 20 of 20
Thread: Pine vs Cypress
-
8th February 2005, 10:27 PM #16
Why is it so?
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Location
- in the outer reaches of Sth Oz
- Age
- 75
- Posts
- 1,604
Pinus I reckon.... the 50's still had some good pinus not like the weed of today
but then I know nothing
PeteWhat this country needs are more unemployed politicians.
Edward Langley, Artist (1928-1995)
-
8th February 2005 10:27 PM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Age
- 2010
- Posts
- Many
-
8th February 2005, 10:27 PM #17
The typo kign
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- Melbourne - Outer East Foothills
- Posts
- 6,786
For what it's worth, I'd go with the baltic theory but whatever it is.........just get into it, it look snice.
If at first you don't succeed, give something else a go. Life is far too short to waste time trying.
-
8th February 2005, 11:01 PM #18
SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Location
- Garvoc VIC AUSTRALIA
- Posts
- 11,464
Its definately Radiata Pine.
The growth rings are far too coarse for Baltic.
-
9th February 2005, 07:18 AM #19
GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Kilmore, near Melbourne, Australia
- Age
- 66
- Posts
- 1,879
yup - radiata..... no doubt whatsoever - it is nothing like Baltic.
Steve
Kilmore (Melbourne-ish)
Australia
....catchy phrase here
-
9th February 2005, 07:54 AM #20
SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
- Kyabram. Vic
- Posts
- 826
Clear radiata pine.
Ken
