Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 31 to 45 of 67
Thread: Ci1 Easy Rougher
-
30th November 2008, 01:40 AM #31
Review
Gave Cliff's rougher a run today. Decided to tackle a Silvertop resin-burl I've been avoiding because it looked like it would be too big a job.
Pic.1 Mounted it on a big faceplate and took to it with the Ci1 at about 600 rpm to start off.
Pic.2 The Ci1 made getting the blank trued a lot easier than it would have been with a gouge and the deflector kept most of the waste close to the lathe which was good.
Pic.3 Certainly removes a lot of timber in a hurry but also takes out a lot of bits I didn't want to lose.
Pic.4 On the left is the surface left by the Ci1 once I got it down to shape and at right is the same section after a couple of light passes with the bowl gouge followed by a shear cut with the wing of the gouge. Really didn't take much to clean the whole thing up ready for sanding.
Pic.5 Figured the burl wasn't solid enough to hold by a recess or spigot so I glued one on and reshaped again to include a foot (just felt it needed one )
Pic.6 Reversed the piece, drilled a starter-hole and started hacking the guts out at about 1000rpm. The edge of the cutter seemed to have dulled a bit already and was really shaking the works so I gave it 1/4 turn and kept going. Found I was getting showered with waste in this mode 'cos it all seems to go straight up and come down on my noggin and down my back - nasty!. I took quite a bit out with the Ci1 but it was really hard going on the piece itself and I didn't want to blow it apart so....
Pic.7...I reverted to the old faithful gouge which quietly sliced away without putting so much stress on everything.( and just streaming shavings on to my arm )
Pic.8 Wanted to see how the Rougher would go on a chunk of Quinine which is the hardest and most abrasive timber I know. One pass on even a small piece like this will take the edge off HSS completely. Handled it commendably!
Pic.9 Also tried roughing down a piece of Dead-Finish to see what sort of surface it would leave. Not bad - but those of you who know Dead-Finish will know it is possible to get a glossy finish if you use a slicing cut with bevel rub.
Summary: Is there a place for it in my kit? Yep! Just won't be on the rack of 'most used' chisels. It's noisy and put's a lot of strain on the gear but it will be invalueable with some of the timbers I use. Will just have to include the cost of the cutters in the price if I ever start selling anything
It is definitely a scraper!
-
30th November 2008 01:40 AM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
-
30th November 2008, 11:56 AM #32
i think one day i will have to try this tool could be very useful
-
30th November 2008, 02:12 PM #33Cliff.
If you find a post of mine that is missing a pic that you'd like to see, let me know & I'll see if I can find a copy.
-
30th November 2008, 05:57 PM #34
I agree with Vern, it has a place as one of the tools in the collection. What I find is its tough going ripping the bark etc off a burl. So for me here it will shine, but with a long handle and a solid curved rest.
For me its essentially a further progreesion in these tools Oland tool - Jordan and then the C1 etcInspiration exists, but it has to find you working. — Pablo Picasso
-
1st December 2008, 03:01 PM #35GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Adelaide
- Posts
- 2,794
Thanks Hughie, I was sure you or others would touch on this without me needing to introduce the comparison. The traditional Oland tool cutter, from what I can gather, is fingernail shaped and is less aggressive than the Ci1, a compromise between maximum roughing effectiveness and finishing. It would appear to me that a square insert with rounded corners mounted at 45 degrees, so as to present the rounded corner, would achieve a similar result. What do you think?
-
11th December 2008, 03:14 PM #36
Am I missing something?
The Ci1 looks like the tool itself is pretty much some square stock with a threaded hole... The magic is in the inserts?
If that is the case I imagine that ordering inserts would cost a LOT less in terms of postage and the inserts are not all that expensive (US$13 or something). Thus you can have a Ci1 without a big expenditure.
Any thoughts?<Insert witty remark here>
-
11th December 2008, 04:20 PM #37GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Adelaide
- Posts
- 2,794
witty remark to be inserted
Yep, you are missing about 6 weeks' discussion.
-
11th December 2008, 09:39 PM #38
Almost....
The angle that the insert is presented to the timber also makes a difference & for this reason the 'pad' on the tip of the tool holder that the insert sits on is tilted back at a slight angle.
Next...
A point not to be over looked.
Somewhere in the instructions, (oops, blokes don't read them. ) it says not to have any more than a 25mm over hang.
Since both & I regularly do so with our HT HS1 & get away with it, we found out the hard way.
BTW. To do so is classed as misuse.
Further more....
I reckon the real secret to this tool is the chip deflector 'cos if you use it straight on with a plunge cut without the chip deflector you will carry out a self administered Septoplasty with wood chips.Cliff.
If you find a post of mine that is missing a pic that you'd like to see, let me know & I'll see if I can find a copy.
-
12th December 2008, 12:16 AM #39
Septoplasty ......... clever dick.
soth
-
12th December 2008, 12:29 AM #40[ It would appear to me that a square insert with rounded corners mounted at 45 degrees, so as to present the rounded corner, would achieve a similar result. What do you think?
Sorry Frank some how I missed this one.
Anyway, yes I think your right. I have played around with the same idea.The only thing is it wont produce a smooth finish but it does bite real well.Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working. — Pablo Picasso
-
12th December 2008, 10:32 AM #41
Thanks Cliff,
I would have thought that the angle of cut could be corrected by tilting the tool ever so slightly, but maybe that changes the mechanics of the way you present the tool.
As for the other two points:
1. Shame about the lack of overhang - it would be a nice tool for aggressive hollowing by the sounds of it.
2. I would think that the chip deflector concept could be fitted to any tool?
Anyway, it sounds as though a home-made version with the good tips would still be a "knock-off" type quality rather than the real thing.
Cheers
Cam<Insert witty remark here>
-
12th December 2008, 10:37 AM #42
Cameron if you go to a round nose tip then the overhang problem is not much to worry about.
I have several round nose cutters of different dia's and there little or no problem. The round nose it not so fierce.Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working. — Pablo Picasso
-
12th December 2008, 11:42 AM #43
Sounds like I had better get a traditional Oland type tool then...
<Insert witty remark here>
-
12th December 2008, 01:12 PM #44
now your talking..................subtle as a broken leg
But I use TCT recycled old ones pm if you dont have access to any.Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working. — Pablo Picasso
-
12th December 2008, 01:20 PM #45Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Adelaide rural - South Australia
- Age
- 66
- Posts
- 849
Well, not really Cameron!
If the tool you are looking for is for removing lots of timber very quickly, there is turn of very out of shape blank, into a first stage form shaping, then you will not find anything that can do it like this tool does, regardless if you use the original or a well built copy. The deflector is essential for this type of tool, due to what it does to the timber,(remove vast amount, fast), the shavings have to go somewhere, the original defector design is just a example of what can be done to stop shavings to hit you in the face or body. Now, anyone can make deflectors for their tools, they can be bigger, different shape, added to the tool in many ways and can even be made as a "trap" for use with your dust collector. Would be a very simple job to install on the tool a trap instead a deflector, actually the affixing system can be the same. You only need a square trap 6"x 6" preferentially (maybe you can go smaller 4"x 4") , a piece of 3" light flexible hose and an adaptor to connect it to the 4" dust collector system. This is all light stuff and from the way the tool works, you can have at least 90% of the shavings being "sucked" directly into the dust collector bins. (no mess)
If you can't understand what I'm suggesting with the trap system, let me know I will make a sketch of it.
Cheers
RBTCO
Similar Threads
-
Ci1 Easy Rougher Review by Cliff.
By Cliff Rogers in forum WOODTURNING - GENERALReplies: 65Last Post: 28th October 2008, 09:33 AM -
Ci! Rougher road test on spindles.
By RETIRED in forum WOODTURNING - GENERALReplies: 18Last Post: 21st October 2008, 01:04 AM -
Easy Rougher Ci1 Tool Loaner
By DJ’s Timber in forum WOODTURNING - GENERALReplies: 6Last Post: 24th September 2008, 11:23 PM -
Easy Rougher Ci1 for loan to forum members
By jefferson in forum WOODTURNING - GENERALReplies: 20Last Post: 24th September 2008, 11:22 PM -
Rougher than usual
By Seventh Wood in forum WOODTURNING - GENERALReplies: 9Last Post: 25th August 2008, 09:40 PM