Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 27
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Horsham Victoria
    Posts
    901

    Default Lathe Bed Theory

    I'm working on a theory about the misalignment of the head and tail stocks and would like some more evidence to support this theory (or perhaps not support it).

    This is what I am thinking: I have noticed two things happen over time with both my Vicmarc lathes;
    1/ the tail stock seems to stick (or slide less freely) in the last 20 or so cms. of its travel towards the headstock. This is on a surface of the lathe bed the tail stock rarely travels because it so close to the head stock.
    2/ over time the head and tail stock alignment seems to get less accurate and the tail stock is in fact lower by .5mm.

    So this has got me thinking. Does the movement of the tail stock up and down the lathe bead wear the bed over a long period of time? I probably use my lathe more than most turners so I am guessing this wearing (if it is a factor) would be more evident on older lathes or lathes used regularly every day.

    Any thoughts on this from others out there??

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Aus.
    Age
    71
    Posts
    12,746

    Default

    Could 2. alternatively be caused by wear in the tailstock quill?
    Cheers, Ern

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    North Of The Boarder
    Age
    68
    Posts
    16,794

    Default

    Brendon good topic

    Lathe bed wear is a fact of life, unless they and the tailstock are hardened like metal lathes..but even over time they also wear. Brendon not just the beds but the slide sides also wear.

    Having them re ground is the best way finding someone to do it at reasonable cost

    I'll be interested to see where this heads.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Nth of Newcastle
    Age
    77
    Posts
    811

    Default

    I'd have thought that the bearing surface on the bottom of the tail stock

    would cop more wear then the bed ? Phil

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Wauchope NSW
    Age
    79
    Posts
    398

    Default

    Hi Brendon

    Have you thought that the banjo may be wearing the bed in that 200 mill closest the headstock.

    Cheers Tony
    Tony

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Horsham Victoria
    Posts
    901

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rsser View Post
    Could 2. alternatively be caused by wear in the tailstock quill?
    I don't think so, no slop in quill.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tony Morton View Post
    Hi Brendon

    Have you thought that the banjo may be wearing the bed in that 200 mill closest the headstock.

    Cheers Tony
    Yes, I did think of this but the question of why the tail stock sticks at that point still remains. I really am doing the electronic version of thinking out loud and was hoping someone might be able to shed some light on the whole issue. The fact it has happened to two of my lathes has me wondering.

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Mareeba Far Nth Qld
    Age
    83
    Posts
    3,070

    Default

    I have experienced this on my lathes also. I honed the ways with some fine (600#) wet and dry paper on a block of wood, and the problem disappeared. Clean also the inside edged and and the underneath surfaces of the ways. I put it down to an accumulation of grain fillers, and residue from some timbers. Both these lathes are Woodfast lathes, one is 30 years old and the other is about20 years old. Does the "cleaning" cause excessive wear? Not that i can detect. After "honing" I rub Ubeaut Traditional wax onto the ways.
    Jim
    Sometimes in the daily challenges that life gives us, we miss what is really important...

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Nerang Queensland
    Age
    66
    Posts
    10,766

    Default

    I have a rotating head lathe, but even after locking it down hard, the headstock does move over time. Not sure why, perhaps vibration or the hard work it does . I simply unlock it, rotate it back, then re-tighten and it is as good as new. It always rotates in the same direction, away from the cutting edge, so I assume it is from the work it does. I've never had any trouble with the tailstock not running true, except when I bent my live centre
    Neil
    ____________________________________________
    Every day presents an opportunity to learn something new

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Arkansas USA
    Age
    85
    Posts
    169

    Default

    Interesting question. My first blush is that if there is wear it would be so negligible as to be of no consequence. However, you use yours a lot and have experienced the problems described.
    Other thoughts are: what kind of surface is the lathe setting on? A wood floor might yield affecting the level.
    I'll opin that this would never happen with my lathe. I regularly clean and wax the bed so my tailstock would be sliding on wax not the cast iron. (actually, with my lathe cast steel)
    I'll follow this thread. Interesting.

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Aus.
    Age
    71
    Posts
    12,746

    Default

    Well, in the mode of thinking out loud ...

    The question is what is causing the relative binding in prob no. 1. I'd assumed you'd done the cleaning up that Jim suggested, and also that the clamp plate hadn't cinched up slightly over the years. Not a prob where it's been used mostly if that's where there's wear.

    Another possibility is that the bed castings may have moved and narrowed slightly at the headstock end. So is there still good clearance between the clamp plate shoulder and the bed slot?

    The banjo, bed and tailstock are all cast iron (which comes with some graphite in it acc to GJ which will help perhaps with sliding) but the clamp plate is steel, prob medium tensile, and maybe this causes greater wear against the iron where it's mostly been used. This, or a stretched clamp plate bolt may have led you to take up the slack on the clamp plate at some stage to accommodate the wear but which now makes for binding where there's little wear.

    Anyway, that's my brain dribble for the day.
    Cheers, Ern

  12. #11
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    North of the coathanger, Sydney
    Age
    68
    Posts
    9,417

    Default

    I wonder whether the too and fro (back and forth?) movement of the tailstock along the bed slowly polishes the bed
    If that's the case it would seem to bind at the point where it doesn't travel as much

    My 2c worth
    regards
    Nick
    veni, vidi,
    tornavi
    Without wood it's just ...

  13. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Oberon, NSW
    Age
    63
    Posts
    13,360

    Default

    Hmmm... Surely if the bed is wearing it'd be becoming thinner and I'd expect the tailstock to slide more freely rather than stick? Unless it's so worn that it's twisting between the ways as it moves... and I suspect that much wear would be eyeballable.

    Have you closely examined the underside of your ways, Brendan? The condition of the top of the bed is fairly obvious at a glance, but how many of us peer underneath our lathes on a regular basis?

    A drop or two of finish may've set under there? Or perhaps there's a burr that's catching the lower mech of the tailstock? After all, most of us set the tailstock mech so that it's only barely releasing when we move the tailstock... so it wouldn't take much of a burr or "debris buildup" to snag things.

    (Also just thinking aloud. )
    I may be weird, but I'm saving up to become eccentric.

    - Andy Mc

  14. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Tallahassee FL USA
    Age
    82
    Posts
    4,650

    Default

    Interesting puzzle. Wear or polishing on the top of the bed should be immediately apparent.

    Have you examined the underside of the tailstock after removal? A possible culprit for vertical mis-alignment could be the manner in which you move the tailstock. Pressure near the top would tend to wear the opposing underside, so that it's no longer flat. The same can occur when sanding a block of wood by moving it against sandpaper on a flat surface - if the pressure isn't uniform, the piece can wind up tapered, which of course might be the objective in such a case. BTDT. Corrective action would be to move the hardware by longitudinal pressure nearer to the bed.

    It might be too late to institute that new habit, but shim stock at one or more corners of the tailstock could restore alignment. BTDT too.

    Cheers,
    Joe
    Of course truth is stranger than fiction.
    Fiction has to make sense. - Mark Twain

  15. #14
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    BELL POST HILL, 3215
    Age
    87
    Posts
    2,332

    Default The Last Few mm.

    Hi to Brendan & Others,
    I also do a lot of Turning, & had the same Problem with my 1990 " Tough " a while back.
    Like Powderpost, Jim, I completely cleaned my Bed with I think 800G.& the Banjo, as well as the Tail Stock.
    I don't think 800 would take any steel off anyway.
    I then used my "Silbien Gliet " Silver Glide, on all surfaces,& Bingo, it did the job.
    So I thought I also may have had some Rubbish where it shouldn't have been.
    So that was my solution. Hope that might help Brendan.
    Regards,
    issatree.
    Regards,
    issatree.
    Have Lathe, Wood Travel.

  16. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Horsham Victoria
    Posts
    901

    Default

    The sticking ain't the problem. I was more concerned with the possible connection between the sticking and the tail stock/ head stock misalignment. Is it possible that the lathe bed and the underneath surface of the tail stock wear over time to the point that the tail stock no longer aligns with the head stock.

    As Wheelinround said, bed wear is a fact of life and I perhaps need to have the whole lot reground. However, I would only trust Vicmarc to do this and it is such a hassle to get the lathe up to them (or down depending on your cosmic view the world).

    Thanks to all who have contributed thus far and your suggestions.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Nail bag chaos theory
    By mic-d in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH WOODWORK
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 30th June 2007, 11:04 PM
  2. My (non-sexist)Theory on Chair Seats
    By Lignum in forum WOODWORK - GENERAL
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 5th November 2005, 08:01 AM
  3. Let's test the theory
    By Peter R in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH WOODWORK
    Replies: 80
    Last Post: 5th December 2004, 06:01 PM
  4. The Buffalo Theory
    By Bazza in forum WOODIES JOKES
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 31st January 2002, 05:33 PM
  5. Buffalo Theory
    By gazaly in forum WOODIES JOKES
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 5th September 2000, 06:43 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •