Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 1 to 15 of 23
Thread: Opinion on method?
-
10th September 2007, 07:03 PM #1
Opinion on method?
I've an idea for an item to enter into a comp, but I'm not sure about the best method.
Basically, it'll be a decanter type affair with the body along similar lines to this:
(Only a rough sketch: size, form and proportion is all still up in the air.)
Now I'm fully aware that it'd be more impressive (esp. to the judges ) it 'was turned as a true hollow-form, hollowing solely through neck. However, I don't want to bore the neck any more than 15mm wide... and given my current tooling this'd leave me with rather thick walls.
Ideally I want it to be lightweight, very thin-walled. Much lighter than the equivalent item in glass. So, my reasoning is to maybe turn the foot as though 'twas going to be a friction fit lid, (thus matching the grain) hollow out from the bottom end and then glue the foot back in.
Whichever way I go, I'll be pouring hot beeswax in from the top and giving it a good ol' swirl around to seal the innards as I'm hoping it'll be a user afterwards.
Naturally, if I hollow from the bottom it can't be entered in the hollow form category, but I think that, properly done, this won't make any difference as to final scoring? Any-one with experience in comp's (judging or otherwise) got any thoughts on this?
- Andy Mc
-
10th September 2007 07:03 PM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Age
- 2010
- Posts
- Many
-
10th September 2007, 07:22 PM #2Hewer of wood
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Location
- Melbourne, Aus.
- Age
- 71
- Posts
- 12,746
'Spect you know this, but ain't the standard fudge method for this kind of vessel to shape the outside, with a bead at the neck, part off at the bead to give you a wider aperture, complete the hollowing and then glue the neck back on.
Of course, it would be difficult with a wood artist who could only hold tools in their mouth.Cheers, Ern
-
10th September 2007, 08:52 PM #3
-
10th September 2007, 09:02 PM #4Hewer of wood
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Location
- Melbourne, Aus.
- Age
- 71
- Posts
- 12,746
Great minds Vern!
Or maybe just retentive ones ...Cheers, Ern
-
11th September 2007, 12:06 AM #5
Aye, I'd thought of that but I'd like the outside form to be an unbroken curve, as it'll have... "those fancy S-shaped handles" ...on each side.
As an aside: what's the proper name for those handles? I know there is one, just never can remember it.
- Andy Mc
-
11th September 2007, 12:26 AM #6
-
11th September 2007, 12:27 AM #7GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Adelaide
- Posts
- 2,794
Ansa. pl.ansae.
ETA: OK, ogee shaped ansae, then...
-
11th September 2007, 07:19 AM #8[Now I'm fully aware that it'd be more impressive (esp. to the judges ) it 'was turned as a true hollow-form, hollowing solely through neck. However, I don't want to bore the neck any more than 15mm wide... and given my current tooling this'd leave me with rather thick walls.
http://www.woodworkforums.ubeaut.com...355#post434355
This would come some where near to assisting along with OGYT laser set up you could produce the thickness you require.
just a thoughtInspiration exists, but it has to find you working. — Pablo Picasso
-
11th September 2007, 03:35 PM #9
Sadly, with my metal fabrication skills the date of entry would be well past before I've finished building the tooling... although I've been conscientiously buliding up a collection of saved posts for tools that I do want to build one day.
ie. I'll get there, just not yet.
As for the handle style, I don't think 'tis ogee. That I would've remembered. It may be a 'right' answer but isn't the term I'm looking for. I think I'll stick to those "fancy S-shaped" or "treble clef style" handles for the meantime.
- Andy Mc
-
11th September 2007, 05:15 PM #10
Skew,
have alook at this, some thing along these lines would ,I think come real close to your needs. Its an easy build, bend, weld, glue the handle.Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working. — Pablo Picasso
-
11th September 2007, 06:14 PM #11
Thanks Hughie, that's what I thought you meant but best to be sure than sorry, eh?
FWIW, here's a screenshot of the outside curve of the form I have plotted. The grid is 5cm, for reference. As you can see, the narrowest part of the neck is 21mm which means an extremely constrained internal bore. 13mm maximum if I can get a constant 4mm wall thickness.
The pic doesn't show handles, inside curve, stopper or foot for sake of simplicity. Of course, I could show you what the complete piece is supposed to look like, but then I'd be giving you ammo to use against me when the final product comes out looking completely different...
- Andy Mc
-
11th September 2007, 08:39 PM #12
-
11th September 2007, 09:13 PM #13The pic doesn't show handles, inside curve, stopper or foot for sake of simplicity. Of course, I could show you what the complete piece is supposed to look like, but then I'd be giving you ammo to use against me when the final product comes out looking completely differentInspiration exists, but it has to find you working. — Pablo Picasso
-
11th September 2007, 09:33 PM #14
Skew,
I did this hollow form a while back. It is 180mm high and 180mm diameter. The opening is 40mm. This one was done with the Sorby Stewart system out of brown pine. The wall thickness is 3/16". The outside was turned first and then the inside. I used a series of wall gauges made from 8# wire bent to a very flat "C" shape to measure the wall thickness. The Stewart system worked very well, but got a bit hairy after four hours concentrating on the job. It was glue chucked to a waste block on a face plate.
JimSometimes in the daily challenges that life gives us, we miss what is really important...
-
11th September 2007, 09:49 PM #15
Jim,
Nice one Skew is gonna take his down to 4mm...likes living dangerously... or challenge addicted..Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working. — Pablo Picasso
Similar Threads
-
Need Opinion
By johnnyxray in forum WOODTURNING - PEN TURNINGReplies: 2Last Post: 19th June 2006, 01:10 AM -
Your opinion
By [email protected]. in forum WOODWORK PICSReplies: 9Last Post: 3rd June 2004, 08:53 AM -
The Scary Sharp method
By 3Landerblue in forum SHARPENINGReplies: 3Last Post: 12th September 2003, 08:31 AM -
What method do you use for crosscutting
By Arron in forum WOODWORK - GENERALReplies: 1Last Post: 20th August 2003, 11:22 PM