Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 23
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Oberon, NSW
    Age
    63
    Posts
    13,360

    Default Opinion on method?

    I've an idea for an item to enter into a comp, but I'm not sure about the best method.

    Basically, it'll be a decanter type affair with the body along similar lines to this:

    (Only a rough sketch: size, form and proportion is all still up in the air.)

    Now I'm fully aware that it'd be more impressive (esp. to the judges ) it 'was turned as a true hollow-form, hollowing solely through neck. However, I don't want to bore the neck any more than 15mm wide... and given my current tooling this'd leave me with rather thick walls.

    Ideally I want it to be lightweight, very thin-walled. Much lighter than the equivalent item in glass. So, my reasoning is to maybe turn the foot as though 'twas going to be a friction fit lid, (thus matching the grain) hollow out from the bottom end and then glue the foot back in.

    Whichever way I go, I'll be pouring hot beeswax in from the top and giving it a good ol' swirl around to seal the innards as I'm hoping it'll be a user afterwards.

    Naturally, if I hollow from the bottom it can't be entered in the hollow form category, but I think that, properly done, this won't make any difference as to final scoring? Any-one with experience in comp's (judging or otherwise) got any thoughts on this?
    I may be weird, but I'm saving up to become eccentric.

    - Andy Mc

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Aus.
    Age
    71
    Posts
    12,746

    Default

    'Spect you know this, but ain't the standard fudge method for this kind of vessel to shape the outside, with a bead at the neck, part off at the bead to give you a wider aperture, complete the hollowing and then glue the neck back on.

    Of course, it would be difficult with a wood artist who could only hold tools in their mouth.
    Cheers, Ern

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Emerald, QLD
    Posts
    4,489

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rsser View Post
    'Spect you know this, but ain't the standard fudge method for this kind of vessel to shape the outside, with a bead at the neck, part off at the bead to give you a wider aperture, complete the hollowing and then glue the neck back on.

    Of course, it would be difficult with a wood artist who could only hold tools in their mouth.
    Damn - too slow again! Was going to suggest that after reading an article on a guy turning big egg forms using a similar technique.
    .
    Updated 8th of February 2024

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Aus.
    Age
    71
    Posts
    12,746

    Default

    Great minds Vern!

    Or maybe just retentive ones ...
    Cheers, Ern

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Oberon, NSW
    Age
    63
    Posts
    13,360

    Default

    Aye, I'd thought of that but I'd like the outside form to be an unbroken curve, as it'll have... "those fancy S-shaped handles" ...on each side.

    As an aside: what's the proper name for those handles? I know there is one, just never can remember it.
    I may be weird, but I'm saving up to become eccentric.

    - Andy Mc

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Berwick, Melbourne
    Age
    64
    Posts
    542

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Skew ChiDAMN!! View Post
    Aye, I'd thought of that but I'd like the outside form to be an unbroken curve, as it'll have... "those fancy S-shaped handles" ...on each side.

    As an aside: what's the proper name for those handles? I know there is one, just never can remember it.

    ogee?
    ________________________________________
    Cheers
    Shorty

    If I can't turn it I'll burn it

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    2,794

    Default

    Ansa. pl.ansae.

    ETA: OK, ogee shaped ansae, then...

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Flinders Shellharbour
    Posts
    5,693

    Default

    [Now I'm fully aware that it'd be more impressive (esp. to the judges ) it 'was turned as a true hollow-form, hollowing solely through neck. However, I don't want to bore the neck any more than 15mm wide... and given my current tooling this'd leave me with rather thick walls.
    Skew not as difficult perhaps as it first appears. A simple adjustment to your tooling.

    http://www.woodworkforums.ubeaut.com...355#post434355

    This would come some where near to assisting along with OGYT laser set up you could produce the thickness you require.

    just a thought
    Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working. — Pablo Picasso


  10. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Oberon, NSW
    Age
    63
    Posts
    13,360

    Default

    Sadly, with my metal fabrication skills the date of entry would be well past before I've finished building the tooling... although I've been conscientiously buliding up a collection of saved posts for tools that I do want to build one day.

    ie. I'll get there, just not yet.


    As for the handle style, I don't think 'tis ogee. That I would've remembered. It may be a 'right' answer but isn't the term I'm looking for. I think I'll stick to those "fancy S-shaped" or "treble clef style" handles for the meantime.
    I may be weird, but I'm saving up to become eccentric.

    - Andy Mc

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Flinders Shellharbour
    Posts
    5,693

    Default

    Skew,

    have alook at this, some thing along these lines would ,I think come real close to your needs. Its an easy build, bend, weld, glue the handle.
    Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working. — Pablo Picasso


  12. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Oberon, NSW
    Age
    63
    Posts
    13,360

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hughie View Post
    Skew,

    have alook at this, some thing along these lines would ,I think come real close to your needs. Its an easy build, bend, weld, glue the handle.
    Thanks Hughie, that's what I thought you meant but best to be sure than sorry, eh?

    FWIW, here's a screenshot of the outside curve of the form I have plotted. The grid is 5cm, for reference. As you can see, the narrowest part of the neck is 21mm which means an extremely constrained internal bore. 13mm maximum if I can get a constant 4mm wall thickness.



    The pic doesn't show handles, inside curve, stopper or foot for sake of simplicity. Of course, I could show you what the complete piece is supposed to look like, but then I'd be giving you ammo to use against me when the final product comes out looking completely different...
    I may be weird, but I'm saving up to become eccentric.

    - Andy Mc

  13. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Emerald, QLD
    Posts
    4,489

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Skew ChiDAMN!! View Post
    ........... The pic doesn't show handles, inside curve, stopper or foot for sake of simplicity. Of course, I could show you what the complete piece is supposed to look like, but then I'd be giving you ammo to use against me when the final product comes out looking completely different...
    You haven't mentioned what timber you're using Skew!? Might be able to help out with something special
    .
    Updated 8th of February 2024

  14. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Flinders Shellharbour
    Posts
    5,693

    Default

    The pic doesn't show handles, inside curve, stopper or foot for sake of simplicity. Of course, I could show you what the complete piece is supposed to look like, but then I'd be giving you ammo to use against me when the final product comes out looking completely different
    no worries, this 'l be enough to plot a basic bar curve. Hmm as Vern says your gonna need some stable dense timber to pull this one off. Wall thickness constant wont be a problem.
    Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working. — Pablo Picasso


  15. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Mareeba Far Nth Qld
    Age
    83
    Posts
    3,070

    Default

    Skew,
    I did this hollow form a while back. It is 180mm high and 180mm diameter. The opening is 40mm. This one was done with the Sorby Stewart system out of brown pine. The wall thickness is 3/16". The outside was turned first and then the inside. I used a series of wall gauges made from 8# wire bent to a very flat "C" shape to measure the wall thickness. The Stewart system worked very well, but got a bit hairy after four hours concentrating on the job. It was glue chucked to a waste block on a face plate.
    Jim
    Sometimes in the daily challenges that life gives us, we miss what is really important...

  16. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Flinders Shellharbour
    Posts
    5,693

    Default

    Jim,

    Nice one Skew is gonna take his down to 4mm...likes living dangerously... or challenge addicted..
    Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working. — Pablo Picasso


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Need Opinion
    By johnnyxray in forum WOODTURNING - PEN TURNING
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 19th June 2006, 01:10 AM
  2. Your opinion
    By [email protected]. in forum WOODWORK PICS
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 3rd June 2004, 08:53 AM
  3. The Scary Sharp method
    By 3Landerblue in forum SHARPENING
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12th September 2003, 08:31 AM
  4. What method do you use for crosscutting
    By Arron in forum WOODWORK - GENERAL
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 20th August 2003, 11:22 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •