Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 16 to 24 of 24
-
15th July 2022, 12:47 PM #16Novice
- Join Date
- Jun 2022
- Location
- Perth
- Age
- 36
- Posts
- 15
If I may ask, what was your take on the H&F house brand machines? On paper the WL 46A looks too good to be true for the price, and I tend to believe that if something seems too good to be true it probably is.... but you never know.
-
15th July 2022 12:47 PM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Age
- 2010
- Posts
- Many
-
15th July 2022, 05:12 PM #17GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- Melbourne, Australia.
- Posts
- 1,268
Funnily enough, this morning I dropped into a friends place for a first visit since 2019, long time between drinks for obvious reasons. The subject was lathes and this lathe was under intense scrutiny by him as a possible purchase.
It bears an uncanny resemblance to the Jet 1642 lathe, or at least the size and placement of various components makes one wonder if the base unit offered by H&F comes from a close relative.
While the 1642 lathes (2 of them) at my wood turning club have provision for a bed extension and/or a drop bed extension, they are not, or were not available to Australian customers as far as I know. The Jet 1642 lathe was a very popular choice when it was available new in Australia, nothing wrong with them and going on my experience using them in my turning club I was seriously considering purchasing one but didn't have the money at the time.
The H&F unit has as an option, a bowl turning attachment for a reasonable price.
W387A - BTA-46 Bowl Turning Attachment | Hare & Forbes Machineryhouse
The weakness for me of the Jet lathes, and the H&F lathe are the tool post holder and the tool post itself. There is nothing wrong with them, they are just ergonomically not quite there. In order of preference with lathes I have used and still use regularly, the Laguna Revo 24-36 tool post arrangement and the current 30mm diameter Vicmark lathes are the best and as rigid as anything. The Laguna lathe is the easiest to use as it has the longest steel handles with a rubberised exterior that is just smooth as to operate. The Vicmark lathes are next easiest to use.
The Jet 1642 lathes have a very usable but not super user friendly clamping system, the same system is used on the H&F lathes and this week I was using a very similar H&F lathe at my Men's Shed and was reminded of just how short the handles/levers are.
The Men's Shed lathe like the current H&F offering, does not have a spindle hand wheel over the motor. This to me is a frustrating omission and I would be looking at whether there is provision to add either a factory handle, or possibly turning a wooden hand wheel and attaching it to the spindle.
I would suggest the H&F lathe is reasonable value and possibly a good buy if you are unable to pick up a similar specified lathe secondhand.
Item number 6 in this picture is the spindle hand wheel I'm talking about.
https://sawmillcreek.org/articles/6/jet1642_features.jpg
Some food for thought.
Mick.
-
17th July 2022, 09:27 AM #18
I had one their early generic lathes and it was well designed just poorly made. But having said that I owned it for 5 years did a few mods and it was good little lathe and for the money it was hard to beat. The later ones are much more refined and look as good as other makes, never used one but looking at them they look good, swing is ok variable speed drive to boot and the price aint bad either, 1.5kw motor and a 1200mm bend which helps to keep the tailstock out of the way. If looking to buy a another lathe on a lower budget it would be good I reckon.
I always think you should buy what you can afford as the cost of the lathe with an eye for the future because the price will superseded by all the accessories many times over in its life.Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working. — Pablo Picasso
-
19th July 2022, 08:32 PM #19Novice
- Join Date
- Jun 2022
- Location
- Perth
- Age
- 36
- Posts
- 15
For future reference it looks like there is a headstock alignment system of sorts - bearing "balls" that rest on springs in the locking bar that locate into depressions on the bottom of the headstock. You can see it from 4:50 in this video: Know-How Series: Coronet Envoy and Regent Clamp Bolt Replacement with Andrew Hall - YouTube. This video was made to show people how to replace a defective part, which you'll find lots of references to when researching this machine.
For sure, not a solid locking mechanism. Seemingly just to let you know it's about in the right spot, and then relies on doing a kiss test like he shows at the end tightening the shaft right down.
-
28th July 2022, 05:25 PM #20Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working. — Pablo Picasso
-
28th July 2022, 06:57 PM #21
I noted the parts #41 "Compressed Spring" & #42 "Steel Ball" in the schematic and could not see any purpose for them other than some form of registration system.
So my original suspicions were correct - "A failure of the locking mechanism would not be pretty! The exploded parts schematic in the online manual confirm my suspicions.The head stock locking shaft is a similar arrangement to a banjo locking shaft & there does not appear to be a locking index pin to positively maintain alignment in the conventional head stock position."Mobyturns
In An Instant Your Life CanChange Forever
-
29th July 2022, 11:22 AM #22
I may have missed something here, but from what I understand there are two components to the positioning/locking mechanism on any swivel head lathe.
A means of quickly finding the 0° or 90° or 45° (or whatever °) position and a mechanism for securely clamping the headstock in the required position regardless of its orientation. I had a quick look at that last video that Silver Capsicum posted and the cam locking mechanism on that is the same as on my Woodfast C1000X swivel head and I have found that to be more than adequate. I'm not an apologist for Record, but the updated locking mechanism on theirs also looks to be quite adequate.
As for the only orientation that is critical, ie 0° for the centres kiss, I would do the kiss procedure, lock the headstock down in that position and drill a hole through the flange skirt on the headstock into the bed of the lathe and drop a pin into that to hold it in the correct position while clamping down next time. A magnet somewhere on the headstock could hold the pin while not in use and countersinking the hole in the bed would help find the position again if the ball bearings mechanism doesn't provide sufficient registration.
As I said earlier in the thread, it's not a lathe that I would consider for myself, but I wouldn't write if off for others on the swivel head mechanism alone.
For example, I might consider it as another lathe at the Men's Shed or for one of my grandchildren, who are probably already eyeing off my lathes...Stay sharp and stay safe!
Neil
-
29th July 2022, 06:50 PM #23
NeilS, The lathe looks to be a reasonable lathe and Andrew Hall's video gives us a better appreciation of the engineering behind the locking mechanism. Perhaps I'm simply biased towards fixed head stock lathes.
The points that I dislike about the cam lock mechanism is that the eccentric shafts do get bent, certainly on banjos with ham fisted turners "locking them down solid." On the Records it appears to be a 16 mm or thereabouts shaft and given the length it should prove difficult to bend, however I'm no fan of Chinese metallurgical quality control! The component that was replaced certainly appeared to be poorly constructed imho.
Note the casting design of the inboard face of the head stock (6'22" in the video) where the end of the cam lock shaft locates (blind socket), and the fact that the shaft does not carry through the whole casting on the inboard end.
Like all designs its a balance between strength, ease of use, and economics. Lets hope they got the balance right. My concerns are that they have not, and given the offset motor and the general design I suspect that we will be hearing of failures of this design (damaged castings about the shaft retaining set screw) as more lathes are in use and as they get significant hours on them especially with larger pieces.Mobyturns
In An Instant Your Life CanChange Forever
-
30th July 2022, 11:58 AM #24
I've noticed......
As you have also probably noticed... I rather like my swivel head!
Anyway, we have given any members of the forum who are considering this lathe some things to think about.
I will add it to our thread on larger lathes available here in Australia (with at least 2HP), which I have now done.
Larger lathes currently available here in AustraliaStay sharp and stay safe!
Neil
Similar Threads
-
N.S.W. Record Power Coronet Herald Lathe with extension bed
By Ruddy in forum WOODWORK - Tools & MachineryReplies: 6Last Post: 30th August 2020, 05:22 PM -
Coronet Number 1 lathe (Record Power)
By splintergroup in forum WOODTURNING - GENERALReplies: 13Last Post: 2nd December 2016, 05:59 AM -
Info on a Record Coronet lathe
By Ralphie in forum WOODTURNING - GENERALReplies: 23Last Post: 24th February 2016, 11:59 PM -
Record Coronet No 3 Lathe
By Ham in forum WOODTURNING - GENERALReplies: 22Last Post: 29th November 2010, 01:33 PM -
Record Coronet lathe for sale
By Me2 in forum WOODTURNING - GENERALReplies: 4Last Post: 16th February 2005, 02:38 PM