Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 23
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Central Coast, NSW
    Posts
    3,330

    Default Making a vertical lathe - and very large bowls

    This is an idea I'm thinking about but because I have no real engineering experience I thought I'd reality-check it here. If its a rubbish idea, please tell me before I expend any more precious thinking-time on it.

    Anyway, a few years ago I bought an inexpensive lathe and got into wood turning. I did turning for about 6 months before giving it up - making some quite nice things - but ultimately deciding there were enough dog-bowls in the world already. The one thing I remained interested in however, which I would still like to pursue, was making some really large bowls - I guess I'm meaning 500+ millimetres across, maybe up to 800mm.

    I have all sorts of ideas about large bowls which look good in my mind (probably not in practise but we will see and thats the fun of it).

    Obviously you cant make something that big on an inexpensive lathe - the distance from bed to centre would stop you if nothing else.

    So I'm thinking of perhaps making my own lathe.

    Most of my mega-bowl ideas are not what you would call finely-featured forms. Thats good, because it steers me away from a high-precision engineering solution.

    Thinking about making a lathe means going back to scratch. As I'm only interested in making a lathe suitable for very large bowls (no turning between centres stuff) I have wondered if the best solution is a vertical lathe. I did a search for vertical lathes for home-oriented wood turning on the internet with no success. This seems odd as I doubt I'm the first person to think of it.

    So I guess its a lathe like a potters wheel - but larger and very much more robust as its turning very large bits of wood.

    The advantages I can see are that:
    1. You would be able to turn a very heavy object (subject to motor size) without gravity playing a negative role. This means you have more tolerance in terms of engineering precision, bearing quality etc. Thus it should be easier to make.
    2. You could have a very wide, flat platen (the wide horizontal plate which I see the blank sitting on), which would enable you to have all sorts of holding mechanisms for these large blanks. The blank would sit on the platen with great stability.
    3. There could be a safety angle. There is little risk of the blank coming loose and hurting you because its already (in a sense) fallen as far as it can.
    4. There would be no limits on the size of the object you could turn, except perhaps motor power.

    Out of these, point 1 is the main one. It seems to me that building a lathe to turn heavy object with a horizontal shaft is wrong, because the object is putting immense downward, and therefore lateral, pressure on the shaft.

    So what I'm thinking about is making something with:
    1. A low robust and rigid table made out of angle iron.
    2. a metal top to the table.
    3. a 2hp motor bolted to the legs of the table.
    4. a central spindle, mounted to the table top, piercing it vertically, and with a pulley on the bottom.
    5. a belt between the motor and the spindle, preferable with gearing for different speeds.
    6. a big wide platen on the top of the spindle - say 600mm wide. This is the bit the blank sits on.
    7. a bearing race towards the outside of the table, directly supporting the platen. Probably a dozen or so bearings - maybe these : http://www.amazon.com/Bearing-6201RS.../dp/B002BBJSO0 .

    The bearing race would take most of the downward force. They would need to be on adjustable shafts, so they could be raised or lowered a tiny bit to make sure all bearings are in contact with the platen. They would need to be in a circular arrangement - so the platen rides smoothly on them. They would need to be somewhere towards the perimeter of the platen - but basically at the point where they provide the most support with the least platen flex. These take most of the downward pressure, so the shaft takes very little pressure and is basically just providing turning force.

    So is this idea any good, or is it rubbish ?

    Arron
    Apologies for unnoticed autocomplete errors.

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Towradgi
    Posts
    4,839

    Default

    So you want the work piece to be horizontal, you having to lean over the piece to shape it, be in the line of fire . . . . You would have to be able to fix your blank to the platen in both orientations, as a big blank has terrific centripetal force even at low speed (<50rpm). Also, how high is the lathe? I have a stuffed back, so leaning over a workpiece for any length of time is out.

    Just a few questions. Have you drawn up a plan? Looked at the physics?

    Not saying it's impossible, but maybe not efficent or practical or safe.
    Pat
    Work is a necessary evil to be avoided. Mark Twain

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Bargara Queensland
    Posts
    82

    Default Making a vertical lathe - and very large bowls

    I have only been turning for about 26 years, and have made bowls/platters 500mm and larger over that time. A dedicated bowl lathe is available from several different sources, and many have made their own, but I have never seen reference to a "vertical" lathe. Maybe all those points you made seem valid to you, but a normal wood lathe with beefed up headstock bearing arrangements and a heavier shaft will do the job. The only other comment I have is, that I hope you have very strong and long-lasting back muscles and spine, to cope with all the bending your "vertical" lathe will force you to do. A dedicated bowl lathe, or even one with a swivel head, will allow you to turn larger bowls and platters in a great deal more comfort, standing right in front of the piece you are turning. Good luck! Doug .

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Horsham Victoria
    Posts
    5,713

    Default

    A vertical lathe is something that has been thought of at some level. There are attachments you can get to use a drill press as a vertical lathe.

    What you say about gravity and balance makes a lot of sense. However while this might be good for holding the work you would be fighting against gravity in using your tools.

    Either way I would be interested in following what you do. I imagine an 'L' shape tool rest to hold your chisel up and to hold it against rotational force at the same time would be in order.

    Relatively cheap would be a basic swivel head lathe which would let you swing a larger bowl along the length of your bed.

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Minnesota USA
    Age
    64
    Posts
    150

    Default Points to ponder

    1 there is no getting out of the line of fire.
    2 unusual tool positions holding the tool above the work rather than at your side as the depth increases or decreases
    you would be stooping or on a ladder.
    3 bending overt he work I didn't think of originally until I thought about holding the tools and getting the swing you
    may want to use on the handle good chance for a catch to clipp one in the head.
    4 fixture would be the same as on a horizontal set up



    For platters have you considered a "T" shaped lathe?
    for bowls it is hard to beat several of the inexpensive yet very robust DIY designs out there.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Bendigo
    Age
    72
    Posts
    1,986

    Default

    The issue - as many previous responses pointed out - is that using a HAND-HELD tool is always going to be too dangerous. However, in metalwork, vertical lathes are common for large objects: https://www.google.com.au/search?q=v...w=1366&bih=643
    If you were thinking of mechanically positioning your cutting tools then this is not such a silly idea.
    The other option is to use 'live' tools (a router for example), positioning and holding that mechanically and using very slow rotational speed might make for a whole new concept!
    On the other hand, large bowls are turned the 'conventional way' too: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VEO43Zo6CbY
    Cheers,
    Joe
    9"thicknesser/planer, 12" bench saw, 2Hp Dusty, 5/8" Drill press, 10" Makita drop saw, 2Hp Makita outer, the usual power tools and carpentry hand tools...

  8. #7
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Central Coast, NSW
    Posts
    3,330

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jhovel View Post
    The issue - as many previous responses pointed out - is that using a HAND-HELD tool is always going to be too dangerous. However, in metalwork, vertical lathes are common for large objects: https://www.google.com.au/search?q=v...w=1366&bih=643
    If you were thinking of mechanically positioning your cutting tools then this is not such a silly idea.
    The other option is to use 'live' tools (a router for example), positioning and holding that mechanically and using very slow rotational speed might make for a whole new concept!
    On the other hand, large bowls are turned the 'conventional way' too: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VEO43Zo6CbY
    Yes, I did intend to use some method of mechanically positioning and holding the tool. This was going to be the subject of a second post - I was keeping the topics separate in the hope of concentrating on the engineering aspects of spinning the bowl first. I can see now it probably wasnt the best way to approach the subject.

    I am interested in a mechanical tool holding because I have Injuries to my hands and arms which make prolonged holding of turning tools too difficult.

    However, some good points have been raised. I cant help thinking that even if a mechanical cutter did most of the work I would still need to do plenty of finish work with hand tools and I dont think that would be possible.

    I also doubt my ability to make an effective tool holder.

    Its starting to sound like a misguided attempt to reinvent something that doesnt need reinventing. Thanks for the guidance so far.

    Cheers
    Arron
    Apologies for unnoticed autocomplete errors.

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Minnesota USA
    Age
    64
    Posts
    150

    Default

    Now you are moving into an area that I have some experience! My dad started out using converted metal lathes in the late 1940's. He ran a production wood turning business for over 60 years. The lathes I have built are a little different. all can be used freehand but they are made to be copy lathes. they are not CNC. I use a typical tool holder for a metal lathe and typical tooling for metal but sharpened for cutting wood. the cross feed screw is replaced with a lever and a template is mounted behind the bed for a finger on the cross slide dust cover to follow. I have adapted lathes for the physically challenged with specialized tooling and user specific adaptations. I would be happy to help any way I can.

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Imbil
    Posts
    1,167

    Default

    Hi all, Sounds like we are getting into the likes of Stephen Hogbin who was mentioned in an earlier post he did a lot of experimental (out there) work on extremely large turntable with an articulated arm with a router attached to the end of the arm. He made some really wild sculptures on it. There were several photo's as I recall in the book he did while here in Australia.
    Regards Rod.

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,222

    Default

    Try thinking about a truck differential and rear axle. They would be strong and depending on the ratio maybe turn the wheel hub with a motor, effectively reversing the ratio. eg one turn of tailshaft = 3 turns of wheels. therefore 3 turns of the wheel then only 1 turn of tailshaft. There would be ways to easily mount a faceplate and driving attachment for wheel/axle. as the diff and wheels are mounted to a vehicle body they should be able to be adapted for a solid horizontal mount, to have the tailshaft end vertical.
    I hope you can understand the idea. I know others have used this method for large horizontal turning, so adapting it for vertical shouldn't be too much more.
    Lyle.

  12. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Monash ACT
    Age
    68
    Posts
    15

    Default

    It strikes me that there are two major issues.

    1. It is easier to balance a blank vertically when it can freely fall to the bottom.
    2. Waste falls off a "normal' lathe - a vertical lathe work area would always be choked with sawdust unless a blower or DC can be attached.

    Comments from other members are equally valid - if you are re-engineering a CNC machine, limiting it to a single axis rotary table seems a backward step.

    Attaching a conventional rotary table to a Wood Wizz would seem cheaper and more capable.

    Best of luck!

  13. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Minnesota USA
    Age
    64
    Posts
    150

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lyle View Post
    Try thinking about a truck differential and rear axle. They would be strong and depending on the ratio maybe turn the wheel hub with a motor, effectively reversing the ratio. eg one turn of tailshaft = 3 turns of wheels. therefore 3 turns of the wheel then only 1 turn of tailshaft. There would be ways to easily mount a faceplate and driving attachment for wheel/axle. as the diff and wheels are mounted to a vehicle body they should be able to be adapted for a solid horizontal mount, to have the tailshaft end vertical.
    I hope you can understand the idea. I know others have used this method for large horizontal turning, so adapting it for vertical shouldn't be too much more.
    Lyle.
    the differential is a reduction from drive shaft to wheel the drive shaft makes more turns than the wheel does. I used one for a machine to cut granite circles up to 8 feet in diameter and it was set so the granite was horizontal.

  14. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    belgrave
    Age
    61
    Posts
    7,934

    Default

    On a "normal " lathe gravity is actually helping you do the turning as the wood is falling on the tool spo to speak instead of you having to push the tool down.

    But having also done pottery and turned the foot of bowls maybe it would work. The chisels would need to be differant through. In pottery the tool is a loop tool with the blade perpendicular to the handle. Like the hook tools that are used to do bowls on pole lathes. And you might need to sit like a potter to do it.

    Holding the tools like a metal lathe would be taking all the fun out of it for me.
    anne-maria.
    T
    ea Lady

    (White with none)
    Follow my little workshop/gallery on facebook. things of clay and wood.

  15. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Horsham Victoria
    Posts
    5,713

    Default

    If you want to trial it before a major commitment you could mound a mini lathe on its end and jut try some stuff first

    I actually love to see someone trying something outside the box


    Dave the turning cowboy

    turning wood into art

  16. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    2,327

    Default

    Proserpine Big Bowl. Their web site is down, do a Google search and talk to some turners about the big bowl.






    So much timber, so little time.

    Paul

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Making bigger bowls on a Nova lathe (with outrigger)
    By mick59wests in forum WOODTURNING - GENERAL
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 21st October 2013, 05:06 PM
  2. Making a vertical silicon mold
    By dai sensei in forum CASTING & STABILISATION
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 18th March 2013, 09:17 PM
  3. Large bowls
    By wheelinround in forum WOODTURNING - GENERAL
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 16th May 2010, 01:42 PM
  4. mods to a mc1100 for large bowls
    By hughie in forum HOMEMADE TOOLS AND JIGS ETC.
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 13th March 2006, 01:12 PM
  5. drying large bowls?
    By leighd in forum WOODTURNING - GENERAL
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 22nd October 2004, 12:16 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •