Thanks Thanks:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 33 of 33

Thread: Woodfast 410

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    950

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Barden Koenig View Post
    The AC version will give you more torque at lower speeds
    I've always understood that DC motors have better torque at low RPM, (which is why they use DC for locomotives).

    Does the variable speed control change the torque characteristics of an AC motor?

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #32
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    6

    Default

    You are right that DC has been used in locomotives for its low rpm torque, but that is in comparison to the combustion engine and I've read information indicating that this system is being replaced with AC due to advances in drives and their lowering cost. Torque in a DC motor gets rather complicated and relies heavily on the build of the motor because to retain torque at low speeds (low voltages) the current must increase (power = voltage times current). And an increase in current pushes heat limitations in the motor windings. More on that here: Torque and speed of a DC motor - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia . Nobody's really wrong in the discussion. It has more to do with keeping up with technology and market advances. It used to be that a DC controller was simpler and less expensive than AC, but a DC motor costs much more than the AC equivalent. Now the DC controller is still simpler, but costs similar, if not more than, the AC controller and AC motors still cost less. There is also increased efficiency in the AC systems.

    Personally, I find the biggest vote towards AC in the comparison of response to load changes. Every DC system I've interacted with has not impressed me in this regard, but AC systems with well-designed drives handle this very well. As woodturners, we dive in and out of cuts all the time and on my older DC system the speed would slow at the introduction of an aggressive cut and when I backed off the speed would surge till it settled out. This was especially dangerous if I had an out-of-balance piece on the lathe, had selected the fastest speed that felt safe, and was near the piece as its speed surged beyond. Admittedly this wasn't the best of DC systems, but those characteristics are common in some magnitude.

    Pardon my longwindedness. Hope it's helpful

  4. #33
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    950

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Barden Koenig View Post
    Pardon my longwindedness. Hope it's helpful
    Very helpful, thanks

    My knowledge on electric motor control systems (which was never comprehensive) is at least 25 years out of date, so I appreciate the info.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. Woodfast
    By stevew in forum WOODTURNING - GENERAL
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 14th December 2009, 04:09 PM
  2. woodfast
    By hutch in forum TABLE SAWS & COMBINATIONS
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 9th November 2008, 01:10 PM
  3. Woodfast or Jet?
    By Chipman in forum WOODTURNING - GENERAL
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 7th May 2008, 11:13 PM
  4. New/Old WOODFAST BS
    By triden in forum BANDSAWS
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 6th August 2006, 11:46 PM
  5. Woodfast 280
    By Don Nethercott in forum WOODTURNING - GENERAL
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 15th September 2004, 07:05 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •