Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 44 of 44
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    back in Alberta for a while
    Age
    68
    Posts
    12,006

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lappa View Post
    Are you sure it’s metho?
    We used metho to do a final clean on brake hydraulic components because it DOES NOT leave a film.
    ah, the confusion between
    pure methanol -- CH3-OH
    methyolated spirits -- CH3-CH2-OH , plus up to 50% water and an additive to make the mixture non-drinkable
    and drinkable ethanol -- CH3−CH2−OH (a.k.a. grain spirit)
    continues


    so which type of "metho" are Lappa and Slave refering to ??


    BTW
    methanol (single carbon atom, plus an -OH), ethanol (two carbon atoms, plus an -OH), propanol (three carbon atoms, plus an -OH) are all miscible in water.
    Miscible means 100% soluble.
    Butanol (four carbon atoms, plus an -OH) is the first of the alcohols considered non-miscible.
    regards from Alberta, Canada

    ian

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #32
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,757

    Default

    There's a good reason most meths is typically 95% (by meths I do mean ethanol

    Again from Wikipedia
    Fractional distillation at atmospheric pressure can concentrate ethanol to 95.6% by weight (89.5 mole%). This mixture is an azeotrope with a boiling point of 78.1 °C (172.6 °F), and cannot be further purified by distillation.

    Addition of an entraining agent, such as
    benzene, cyclohexane, or heptane, allows a new ternary azeotrope comprising the ethanol, water, and the entraining agent to be formed. This lower-boiling ternary azeotrope is removed preferentially, leading to water-free ethanol.At pressures less than atmospheric pressure, the composition of the ethanol-water azeotrope shifts to more ethanol-rich mixtures, and at pressures less than 70 torr(9.333 kPa), there is no azeotrope, and it is possible to distill absolute ethanol from an ethanol-water mixture. While vacuum distillation of ethanol is not presently economical, pressure-swing distillation is a topic of current research. In this technique, a reduced-pressure distillation first yields an ethanol-water mixture of more than 95.6% ethanol. Then, fractional distillation of this mixture at atmospheric pressure distills off the 95.6% azeotrope, leaving anhydrous ethanol at the bottom
    In other words to produce more than 95.6% Meths costs $$

    IPA is even worse as purifying IPA by simple distillation only leads to 88% IPA.

    You can always make your own real methanol by heating wood chips in a sealed container and condensing the output vapour - it will contain a heap of water (and other crap) so will need secondary distillation. Because Methanol has a significantly lower boiling than ethanol it can be better separated from water,
    WATCH OUT for fires.

  4. #33
    Mobyturns's Avatar
    Mobyturns is offline In An Instant Your Life Can Change Forever
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    "Brownsville" Nth QLD
    Age
    66
    Posts
    4,414

    Default

    Bob, so when a manufacturer says their product contains "Min 99% Ethanol" they are probably telling a Furphy!
    Mobyturns

    In An Instant Your Life CanChange Forever

  5. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Sydney Upper North Shore
    Posts
    4,464

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ian View Post
    ah, the confusion between
    pure methanol -- CH3-OH
    methyolated spirits -- CH3-CH2-OH , plus up to 50% water and an additive to make the mixture non-drinkable
    and drinkable ethanol -- CH3−CH2−OH (a.k.a. grain spirit)
    continues


    so which type of "metho" are Lappa and Slave refering to ??


    BTW
    methanol (single carbon atom, plus an -OH), ethanol (two carbon atoms, plus an -OH), propanol (three carbon atoms, plus an -OH) are all miscible in water.
    Miscible means 100% soluble.
    Butanol (four carbon atoms, plus an -OH) is the first of the alcohols considered non-miscible.
    No confusion in my mind.
    I’m talking about the common, everyday “metho” that you buy at Bunnies, Coles, Woolworths, Hardware stores labelled as Methylated Spirits.

    F2D26ACB-643F-4A4D-AF2F-C0D6E07ABB75.jpeg

    BTW - never heard of Methyolated Spirits - must be a Canadian thing
    Also, which of the above would leave an oily film on glass?

  6. #35
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    back in Alberta for a while
    Age
    68
    Posts
    12,006

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lappa View Post
    never heard of Methyolated Spirits - must be a Canadian thing
    I don't believe that I ever claimed to be able to spel




    Quote Originally Posted by Lappa View Post
    which of the above would leave an oily film on glass?
    I really don't know, but suspect that once the ethanol percentage drops below 100 proof (i.e. the water content exceeds 50%) the water might lead to observed streaking (I'm not sure that I've correctly spelled "streaking")
    BobL may have a better handle on the issue.
    regards from Alberta, Canada

    ian

  7. #36
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    melbourne australia
    Posts
    2,622

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mobyturns View Post
    Bob, so when a manufacturer says their product contains "Min 99% Ethanol" they are probably telling a Furphy!
    Unlikely. They'd be opening themselves up for prosecution.

    I rang the supplier in the link I posted above. They have used the wrong photo. He confirmed his IMS-100 is 100% ethanol.

    So, if anyone wants 100% ethanol at a reasonable price it is available in Melbourne and Sydney from the links above. If you want to make your own poisonous methanol from wood, well you could do that too I guess.

  8. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Sydney Upper North Shore
    Posts
    4,464

    Default

    Just noted an interesting spec. on the picture I posted.

    I normally buy Coles Brand Methylated Spirits which states >95% ethanol. Due to a run on Methylated Spirits (by people making their own hand sanitiser), Coles have had no stock for months.
    It only came back in to my local store about 3 weeks ago and now it’s Glendale brand which I see states <95% ethanol.
    Thank goodness for this thread as I was just about to make a new batch of shellac and I never use Metho with less than 95% ethanol and the Coles brand has always been successful. BTW, I always open a brand new bottle when dissolving the flakes or buttons and use the remainder for cleanup etc.

  9. #38
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,757

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mobyturns View Post
    Bob, so when a manufacturer says their product contains "Min 99% Ethanol" they are probably telling a Furphy!
    No - it probably just means they have paid to have it purified.
    Like bottled water the cost of the ethanol in a bottle of ethanol is the minor component.
    Ethanol costs very little to make - it's the packaging, storage, distribution and marketing/advertising that costs.


    But claiming 100% purity for anything is a complete crock.
    That's one thing I heavily trained in and practiced at work ie the the nominal level of impurities in any material..

    And don't forget that water is not the only contaminant.
    The highest purity lab grade ethanol I have seen from a specialist lab supplier was >99.8% pure and that was about $200/L
    At work we further purified this by a process know as evaporative distillation - not to get the water out (in fact this process added water as we didn't care about the water) but to reduce the trace metal contaminants which were in the sub microgram per gram range. we used to lose about half the ethanol in the process

    We also used to produce some of the cleanest lead free water on earth.
    Starting with tap water, sediment and charcoal filters, reverse osmosis, double deionisation, triple sub boiling distillation.
    At this point the lead concentration was around 10 femtograms per gram.
    That's 6 orders of magnitude less that micrograms per gram (micro, nano, pico, femto)
    Yet we did not claim 100%

  10. #39
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,757

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ian View Post
    I don't believe that I ever claimed to be able to spel
    I really don't know, but suspect that once the ethanol percentage drops below 100 proof (i.e. the water content exceeds 50%) the water might lead to observed streaking (I'm not sure that I've correctly spelled "streaking")
    BobL may have a better handle on the issue.
    Not sure- there are lots of other organic materials in unpurified ethanol which are also likely to produce the streaks.

  11. #40
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    749

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BobL View Post
    No - it probably just means they have paid to have it purified.
    Like bottled water the cost of the ethanol in a bottle of ethanol is the minor component.
    Ethanol costs very little to make - it's the packaging, storage, distribution and marketing/advertising that costs.


    But claiming 100% purity for anything is a complete crock.
    That's one thing I heavily trained in and practiced at work ie the the nominal level of impurities in any material..

    And don't forget that water is not the only contaminant.
    The highest purity lab grade ethanol I have seen from a specialist lab supplier was >99.8% pure and that was about $200/L
    At work we further purified this by a process know as evaporative distillation - not to get the water out (in fact this process added water as we didn't care about the water) but to reduce the trace metal contaminants which were in the sub microgram per gram range. we used to lose about half the ethanol in the process

    We also used to produce some of the cleanest lead free water on earth.
    Starting with tap water, sediment and charcoal filters, reverse osmosis, double deionisation, triple sub boiling distillation.
    At this point the lead concentration was around 10 femtograms per gram.
    That's 6 orders of magnitude less that micrograms per gram (micro, nano, pico, femto)
    Yet we did not claim 100%
    I suspect they can get away with saying that because it would be considered +/- 1% (Well - minus really , given the claim) The number of significant digits in the claimed measurement impacts precision of the claim.
    They probably won't get away with 100.0%

  12. #41
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    749

    Default

    Methanol should not be considered for use with shellac. It causes the shellac to become very brittle and crazed.

    The confusion some have is the term "methylated spirits". Be confused no more. "Spirits" is an old term for highly distilled grain alcohol, in other words ethanol. The longer term is "rectified spirits". The process of "methylating" it involved adding a small quantity methyl alcohol to poison it so it would not be consumed. The authorities wanted to ensure anyone consuming alcohol paid taxes, and the seppos did not want anyone to drink alcohol. Another term is denatured alcohol. These days we add bittering agents, rather than adding methanol to poison it, and sometimes an agent to induce vomiting.

    You can substitute 2-propynol for ethanol when mixing shellac. It will marginally affect drying time, but otherwise works well.

  13. #42
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,757

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RossM View Post
    I suspect they can get away with saying that because it would be considered +/- 1% (Well - minus really , given the claim) The number of significant digits in the claimed measurement impacts precision of the claim.
    They probably won't get away with 100.0%
    Technically speaking, to claim the default +/- 1% they would need to state it as "100. %"
    Implied +/- 1 only applies to rightmost non-zero digit on the left hand side of a number with no decimal point.
    Technically 100 (no decimal point) is considered as +/-100.
    So 110 implies +/-10, 101 +/-1
    This does not apply to digits on the RHS of a decimal point, ie 100.0 does imply +/- 0.1

    This is about as nerdy as this gets because nobody actually writes 100. +/-1
    We had a few debates about such minutiae on that International Science panel I served on for a couple of decades.

  14. #43
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Sunbury, Vic
    Age
    84
    Posts
    2,713

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RossM View Post
    "Spirits" is an old term for highly distilled grain alcohol, in other words ethanol. The longer term is "rectified spirits".
    When some Latin terms were still used in pharmacy it was known as SVR - Spirit Vini Rect - Rectified Spirit of Wine. Showing my age now.
    Tom

    "It's good enough" is low aim

  15. #44
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    749

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BobL View Post
    Technically speaking, to claim the default +/- 1% they would need to state it as "100. %"
    Implied +/- 1 only applies to rightmost non-zero digit on the left hand side of a number with no decimal point.
    Technically 100 (no decimal point) is considered as +/-100.
    So 110 implies +/-10, 101 +/-1
    This does not apply to digits on the RHS of a decimal point, ie 100.0 does imply +/- 0.1

    This is about as nerdy as this gets because nobody actually writes 100. +/-1
    We had a few debates about such minutiae on that International Science panel I served on for a couple of decades.
    Now getting off topic, but - the treatment of trailing zeros in whole numbers varies and does not always follow the convention noted above, and is a real can of worms. For complete disambiguation where it matters, these numbers should really be written in scientific notation, where the number of significant digits is completely defined. Eg 1 x 10 to power 2 vs 1.00 x 10 to power 2 (the first being 100 with one significant digit and the second having three significant digits.)

    However for the 100% ethanol above, there is wiggle room for the claim made; much more so if you interpret the number as having only one significant digit.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. Low water alcohol for shellac
    By Dengue in forum FINISHING
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 27th January 2019, 04:15 AM
  2. Where to get 100% denatured absolute alcohol
    By Dengue in forum FINISHING
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 26th October 2012, 10:21 PM
  3. SD Alcohol 40-b (denatured alcohol)
    By abitfishy in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH WOODWORK
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 9th October 2011, 11:12 AM
  4. Does denatured alcohol harm wood color?
    By karlkuehn in forum WOODTURNING - PEN TURNING
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 15th August 2007, 09:48 PM
  5. denatured alcohol drying
    By weisyboy in forum WOODTURNING - GENERAL
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 6th September 2006, 10:09 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •