Seeing Dave's efforts at making some more QCTP holders (https://www.woodworkforums.com/f65/ma...6/)has worn me out just looking at it, but has made me wonder whether any particular style is better than another.
Is anyone interested in testing the repeatablity of their holders for a comparison? So far I've thought of 3 tests that might be meaningful -
- Locking a holder onto the post and checking the vertical position
- Locking a holder onto the post and checking the horizontal position
- Locking a holder onto the post and checking the vertical deflection while applying a small torque - say 20Nm
The results would mainly benefit people thinking about converting to a QCTP set up and give them a starting point - are clones more rigid than genuine; are home made holders as good as factory; is there a brand of clone better than another; is a used holder much worse than new?
I was thinking of doing this say 30 times and comparing the results - average and standard deviation. My holder is a secondhand Aloris so I could do that but if other members have other types or styles (including the various clones) then we could get a meaningful set of comparative data.
The first two tests are simple but the third needs some thought as if we are not careful things could be influenced by the rigidity of the compound & cross slide. I'm thinking that the torque would be applied by welding a bolt or nut on the side of a piece of bar and securing that in the holder, with the measuring device (dial indicator) at a set distance from the torquing point.
I'd post a test plan so we are all doing the same thing but first we need to agree what that is. Anyone got any ideas on whether or not these tests will tell us anything? Is there a particular method we should adopt? Are there other tests that should be done at the same time? Most importantly, does anyone want to do any of this?
Michael