Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 1 to 15 of 17
-
16th October 2007, 11:35 AM #1Novice
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Pemberton
- Posts
- 12
Acceptable deflection in jarrah bookcase shelves
Using the "sagulator" (http://www.woodbin.com/calcs/sagulator.htm) I calculate the deflection on 19mm x 900 mm jarrah to be between 1.5mm and 3mm (depending on width and loading weight).
Is this an acceptable amount of deflection? Or do I need to think about adding support to the shelves?
The reason that I am trying to avoid support is that the bookcase I am building is matching an existing old bookcase that has 900mm lengths in 15mm jarrah with very heavy loadings (set of old encyclopaedia for example) with minimal to NO deflection.
Is older jarrah so much better than the stuff we get today?
I would prefer to stick with the 19mm and no shelf support - but I do not want to be coming back here to ask for a fix for sagging shelves...
Cheers,
SladeWhat worries you, masters you - John Locke
No worries...
-
16th October 2007 11:35 AM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
-
16th October 2007, 12:44 PM #2SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Nicholls ACT
- Posts
- 728
Does the bookcase have a back on it and are the shelves fixed. If so you would not have any sag. I don't know about movable shelves. If you have a back you could put a centre support in the back if it is a problem. The books would cover the holes?! You could also use shelves which bow opwards by a few mm and use the deflection to level them out! If none of these are suitable you could rebate a piece of aluminium or steel bar into the back of the shelf.
I would test a shelf of the size you want with a test load and see if it bothers you first.
Pusser
-
16th October 2007, 01:07 PM #3
19mm Jarra would be quite ok.
The proof is in the bookcase you are comparing too.
-
16th October 2007, 01:37 PM #4Novice
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Pemberton
- Posts
- 12
Thanks Pusser and Echnidna,
No back, but deep rebates on the sides (15mm).
The existing case also has no back support, and much smaller rebates - so in principle it should work.
Worth the risk, and retrofit some support if neccessary....
Cheers,
SladeWhat worries you, masters you - John Locke
No worries...
-
16th October 2007, 06:30 PM #5
Slade, using that calc you need a load of 1000kg on a 900x200/19mm shelf(even loaded) to get a 1mm deflection!
I would like to actually see that tho!
Test it... get the jarrah and put it between to bricks then stand on on it, it should take your weight with a little sag/flex.....................................................................
-
17th October 2007, 01:00 AM #6GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Adelaide
- Posts
- 2,794
[quote=Harry72;606274]Slade, using that calc you need a load of 1000kg on a 900x200/19mm shelf(even loaded) to get a 1mm deflection!
As I read it, 30 kg will result in 1.88 mm sag, according to the notes undetectable by the eye on 900 wide. IMHO you mixed measurements.
If the defection is unacceptable, we'll court martial the shelf.
-
17th October 2007, 06:23 AM #7SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Posts
- 686
Hi Knight,
I'd make the trenches that the bookshelves fit into about 1/3 of the thickness of the side - without looking at your drawing, if it's a 2" side, then the trenches are about 15mm deep, a 25mm side has a trench of about 10mm or so.
The deflection of 3mm is undetectable to the eye - if you need more support, use the metal cleat or build up the front or back lip of the shelf.
Cheers,
eddie
-
17th October 2007, 07:41 AM #8GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jun 2003
- Location
- Sunbury, Vic
- Age
- 84
- Posts
- 2,727
I have made 2 bookshelves 1 metre wide & 2.1 metres high from 19mm recycled jarrah. They do not have backs and there is no noticable deflection.
I used sliding dovetails for top, bottom and middle shelves and trenches for the others. They have a narrow face frame as wellTom
"It's good enough" is low aim
-
17th October 2007, 12:44 PM #9Novice
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Pemberton
- Posts
- 12
Thanks all for your responses.
Harry72 - I have put in Jarrah - 30kg Uniform load - 900 x 160 x 19 mm and get a deflection reading of 2.36mm.
I was considering having some narrow to shelves of 125 mm wide at the top, which is where the 3mm deflection figure came from. Then again, narrow shelves are for small paperbacks - so 900 mm of paperbacks would probbaly only weight <12kg which results in a 1.2 mm deflection.
I may increase the width of the higher shelves for reasons of practicality, rather than deflection. Most books in the shops are oversized these days, and the need for the smaller width shelves may not exist.
Cheers,
SladeWhat worries you, masters you - John Locke
No worries...
-
17th October 2007, 09:44 PM #10
-
17th October 2007, 11:08 PM #11GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Adelaide
- Posts
- 2,794
-
18th October 2007, 09:29 PM #12
Yes rounding... but using metric there is no need for rounding, its not like you need to convert it from imp to met... its met to met!
....................................................................
-
18th October 2007, 10:13 PM #13GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Adelaide
- Posts
- 2,794
-
19th October 2007, 11:16 AM #14.
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Perth
- Posts
- 27,813
Experimental data
I used a 1000 x 140 x 19 mm jarrah board with a 17.5 kg semi-central load and got a deflection of 2.65 mm
Sagulator give between 2.15mm to 3.45mm so it seems to be working correctly.
Is it acceptable? That's about what we have for our jarrah bookcases and you don't notice it unless you really look down the sides or compare a lightly with a heavily ladened shelf.
Cheers
-
19th October 2007, 10:26 PM #15
Similar Threads
-
Knick-knack shelves
By zenwood in forum WOODWORK PICSReplies: 3Last Post: 11th June 2005, 07:39 PM -
WHATHA??? shock hits!! man falls of perch
By Wild Dingo in forum WOODWORK PICSReplies: 16Last Post: 9th August 2004, 09:49 PM -
Picking Jarrah from a Jarrah and Karri rack
By gmcginty in forum TIMBERReplies: 5Last Post: 7th December 2003, 11:52 PM