Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 1 to 14 of 14
-
25th January 2008, 10:16 AM #1
Edge jointing with a plane - you don't need square edges or even uniform width boards
A perennial question is how to ensure square edges when joining two or more boards to make a wider board. Hours can be spent setting up a jointing machine or fiddling with a jointer plane to ensure that the edges to be joined are exactly square to the faces.
By taking the boards to be joined and folding them up concertina-style, they can be clamped in the vice and all the mating edges can be planed with a handplane. Provided that the finished edges all lie in a plane, they will form a perfect edge joint even when they are not square. Furthermore, the boards can have non-square edges, combined with a non-uniform width (as long as the width varies linearly), and they will still form a perfect set of edge-to-edge joints. The final panel will, of course, not be of uniform width and will have non-straight ends, so it will need trimming.
These ideas are illustrated in the following diagrams.
Pic 1: Edge joining two boards---the errors in the non-square edges cancel each other outh when the boards are laid flat.
Pic 2: Edge joining multiple boards---mutliple cancellations (here the boards are of uniform width)
Pic 3: Edge joining multiple boards of varying widths---this is an extreme case for illustrative purposes showing edges wildly off-square combined with a non-uniform board width. When the boards are unfolded, the errors in the mating edges still cancel out, and you get perfect edge-to-edge mating. The whole scenario is shown from both sides.
So: go forth and plane your edges for joining, and never worry about a square edge or uniform width again!
The only reason for trying to get edges that are approximately square is so they don't get squeezed out of alignment when clamping the glue-up. A close enough joint for this purpose should be easily achieved by eye.Those are my principles, and if you don't like them . . . well, I have others.
-
25th January 2008 10:16 AM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Age
- 2010
- Posts
- Many
-
25th January 2008, 10:28 AM #2
The same technique applies to the jointer - you make sure that alternate faces are against the fence so that any errors cancel themselves out.
Nice set of graphics to illustrate the technique.
However, I do think it's worth taking the time to set your jointer fence square, or practice the hand plane technique, for the times when you do want things to be square"I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person I'm preaching to."
-
25th January 2008, 10:35 AM #3
Sometimes you don't even need to clamp up. On one book matched panel I made I just followed the old hide glue instructions, rubbed the joint (using PVA) and left the panel propped up at about 75deg on two battens against a wall.
Door panel is still OK 7 years on....
-
25th January 2008, 03:01 PM #4.
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Perth
- Posts
- 27,829
Just to add to this discussion. Here's how we butt joined the 2 thin boards that make up the back, and the sound board, of an acoustic guitar.
Firstly we approximately jointed the edges as perZen's post.
Then using an MDF base, nail a couple of blocks on the left hand side.
Position a piece of scrapiata on the middle line and place boards as shown. The piece of scrap holds the middle edge of the boards up above the MDF by about 20 mm.
Nail a couple of blocks hard up against the boards on their RHS to MDF.
add glue to mid joint and remove scrap of wood on the midline.
Push boards down and lightly clamp in place (only small clamps needed). If you want to you can also clamp a bit of hardwood across the top as well.
Oh yeah - don't forget to use a glue barrier (like waxed paper or plastic) between the boards and the MDF (and hardwood scrap), otherwise it's a # $^%#$!
-
25th January 2008, 06:30 PM #5
I agree it works.
Personally think you should still aim for close to square at least, or else at clamp up they may be more inclined to slip over each other.
I prefer to attach a fence to the plane. There's those veritas thingos, or, what I've done is just clamp some rebated stock onto the wings of my no.7.
And I think you still have to focus when running that plane. Ultimately want a full complete thin shaving off each, with no camber on the blade.
you still should check for fits IMO, if you put a mild valley in it, that error will double at the join etc etc.
whats best though I think...just quietly.....is to face/edge on a well setup jointer to get a perfect square edge initially..... then run through the table saw to rip to width......then clean up this edge by running it through the thicknesser on its jointed edge if the width/thickness ratio of your stock isn't too large to plane to width (ie, she won't lean over on the thicknesser) ....then through again on its face to plane to thickness
And then lay all the boards down and rearrange to align grain how you like.....draw your triangle thingo......then check for edge fits....They should be pretty close already.
only then would I bring out the plane just for those few fits that need a little work (with a square fence clamped on it) and take light shavings off here or there so the edges close up nice with just a little pressure at the middle.
Then decide on how your'll joint them....tongue, or biscuits or just butt. Biscuits are probably the easiest. Mostly just something to lock the boards aligned while you clamp up.
IMO <- ie. uno. its just another way of doing it amongst lots of ways.
-
25th January 2008, 08:21 PM #6SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- t
- Posts
- 961
Planing edge joins has been only option I've ever had.
As long as you ensure both faces are in or both faces are out you get a perfect join everytime..
-
26th January 2008, 10:21 AM #7
-
26th January 2008, 01:05 PM #8
-
26th January 2008, 01:08 PM #9.
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Perth
- Posts
- 27,829
Cheers Zen. Not my idea though. Picked it up along with a heap of others while attending an Acoustic Guitar making school in Melbourne earlier this month. Full thread showing making of guitar from whoa to go in 36 pics here.
-
26th January 2008, 01:52 PM #10
No one seems to have mentioned using a spring joint. I'm sure most know to do this.
What is a spring joint? Trying to mate two flat sides is difficult since it is impossible to get perfect flatness. The worst situation one could wish for is trying to join two edges where there is a slight hump between them. They will rock on this, and attempts to force tem together with clamps will later fail as the internal stresses push them apart.
It is better to have a slight hollow at the centre so that the boards touch at the ends. A very slight hollow (a fine plane shaving thick) can be forced together.
So the idea is to take a fine shaving from the centre of each board when you complete the match plaing for the edges at the start. Take one shaving in the centre, another wider from 1 cm inside the near end to 1 cm inside the far end, then a final shaving through the length of the board(s). Now you are ready to glue up.
Regards from Perth
DerekVisit www.inthewoodshop.com for tutorials on constructing handtools, handtool reviews, and my trials and tribulations with furniture builds.
-
26th January 2008, 10:42 PM #11Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Iowa-USA
- Age
- 77
- Posts
- 75
Bookmatched.
-
27th January 2008, 01:01 AM #12
Yep, but it is impossible to do with 1/8" to 3/16" thick shop-sawn veneer, at least if it is wider than a couple inches like the examples above...
As for jointing thicker pieces flat for glue-ups, I go for pieces that I can stand one piece on edge, lay the mating piece on it and clamp one end tight. If the far end doesn't rise off and I cannot see light through the entire length of the join, I figure that's pretty flat. That's when I glue-up. It's not difficult to do.
On long work, a sprung joint has long been utilized, but I think it was more applicable when homes had large swings in humidity. A sprung joint, in theory, allowed the ends (which saw faster/larger moisture change) to remain together. I have seen a number of tables that toward the centers had gaps appearing. Most likely due to over-sprung joints combined with aging/failing glue joins. Still, I try to spring long open-span tops (think table tops) by taking stopped, very thin shavings. A few thou in the center, tapering out to the edges.
But I never did make very many large tables with narrow enough boards that could be sprung. Mostly credenzas, bureaus and the like where there was means to fasten in a few places mid-span. So sprung joints were few and far between.
Take care, Mike
-
27th January 2008, 08:59 AM #13
-
27th January 2008, 09:43 AM #14
Hi Jake
Yeah, somehow I missed your description of a spring or sprung joint.
Regards from Perth
DerekVisit www.inthewoodshop.com for tutorials on constructing handtools, handtool reviews, and my trials and tribulations with furniture builds.
Similar Threads
-
Edge jointing
By old_picker in forum ROUTING FORUMReplies: 2Last Post: 7th May 2007, 06:49 PM -
Edge Jointing 70" 3/4" Cherry boards
By ritchie in forum WOODWORK - GENERALReplies: 4Last Post: 4th July 2006, 06:10 PM -
Shellawax on square edge
By Gingermick in forum WOODTURNING - GENERALReplies: 7Last Post: 17th March 2005, 08:56 PM -
Biscuits or dowels for edge jointing?
By derekcohen in forum HAND TOOLS - POWEREDReplies: 17Last Post: 18th April 2004, 04:58 PM -
Jointing board edges with a handplane
By derekcohen in forum HOMEMADE TOOLS AND JIGS ETC.Replies: 2Last Post: 2nd February 2004, 04:53 AM