Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Darwin NT
    Posts
    4

    Default combination saws

    I put in a querey yesterday as a newcomer but got no response - I think it went out into the ether or in the wrong place

    I have been considering the purchase of a combination machine to go in my smallish hobby shed and have narrowed it down in my perhaps ignorance to the robland X260 and the hammer C3 31 there is a cost differential with the extra needed to make the machines work of about $4000
    I have been unable to locate any assessments let alone a comparison of these machines (I wonder if the magazines are interested in informiing their readers or gathering advertising revenue).
    If there are any of you out there who can advise on these and perhaps other combination machines i would appreciate your input

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Kalamunda, WA
    Age
    52
    Posts
    1,989

    Default

    Welcome Hughbrad.

    Which machine is the cost difference in favour of? I have not seen the Robland unit but would be surprised if as a hobbiest you could find it to be $4000 better than the Hammer. I have seen very minimal discussion on the forum regarding either of these units but here is a bit

    https://www.woodworkforums.com/f13/hammer-machines-53783

    https://www.woodworkforums.com/f153/felders-hammer-a3-31-green-chum-53329

    As far as reviews, there was a review on planer thicknessers in Aust Wood Review #47 but it did not include the Robland.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Darwin NT
    Posts
    4

    Default combination Saws

    thanks for your reply - the cost difference of about $4000 is in favour of the Robland and I saw an unfavourable review of the Hammer in US Finewoodworking but that was 4 years old

    Hammer seem to have a good reputation but I find it difficult to fault the Robland just by inspecting it - It seems solid and the company is not new - I thought there might be a few users out there who could give me the benefit of their experience

    I'll stay on the topic for a couple of days then I will have to make a choice since my quote time is running short

    hughbrad

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Kalamunda, WA
    Age
    52
    Posts
    1,989

    Default

    So the Robland is around $5500? From memory the current price on the Hammer is $9500 according to the price on the web site.

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Darwin NT
    Posts
    4

    Default combination saws

    burnsie

    the offer I have on the Robland is about $7700 with lots of extras - the same for Hammer is about $4000 more even when on special.

    hughbrad

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Kalamunda, WA
    Age
    52
    Posts
    1,989

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hughbrad View Post
    burnsie

    the offer I have on the Robland is about $7700 with lots of extras - the same for Hammer is about $4000 more even when on special.

    hughbrad
    Sounds like a prtty good deal this thread puts the Robland at $12600.

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    57

    Default www.finewoodworking.com

    Fine Woodworking magazine runs an online service (I think it costs $20 or $30 pa, but it may be only avail to magazine subscribers) which enables you to search and access their old reviews. And you can pay by credit card so have access almost immediately.
    There are also ongoing individual reviews of major machines (including many combination machines) which if nothing else may help you work out what to look for in making your choice. Those reviews have comments by owners as well.
    I went through the difficult task about 18 months ago of choosing a combination machine and decided on a TecnoMax (by MiniMax).
    Good luck.

    Gordon

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    686

    Default

    I didn't like the Robland when I saw one, brad.

    The build quality was very light and there's too much flex in the frame and in my opinion it not work effectively. The more I put weight (20kg or so) on the cantilevered arm, the lower the saw table dropped and the further out of square the cut became.

    I've got an old MiniMax 6 in 1 that I do work at home on. Paid about $2k for it and then about another $2k to get it fixed.

    Google on Felder NSW, or call Gabbett 02.98315044 (Lee Gabbett) and ask what they've got second hand - might be worth a call.

    Cheers,

    eddie

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Bowral
    Posts
    837

    Default

    I've just had a quick look on the Finewoodworking site for reviews of each machine. There is a review of the Robland NX31 (but I can't find one of the X260) and one of the Hammer C3-31. Neither of these is particularly complimentary. As a comparison there is a review of the Felder CF731 and it is very complimentary (but of course it is $US5k more expensive). There is also a complimentary review of the Minimax CU300, which is cheaper in the US then either the Robland NX31 or the Hammer C3-31. I have no idea what they cost here. I've found Felder are quite happy to talk about second hand machines, but they still aren't particularly cheap!

    An online subscription to the Finewoodworking site is available to non-magazine-subscribers but it costs more, I believe.
    Bob C.

    Never give up.

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Kiewa
    Age
    64
    Posts
    1,636

    Default

    I've got a Minimax CU 300 combo and would certainly recommend it if you can't afford separate machines. Also, go for as long a sliding table as you can afford - like it or not, sheet work requires a table 2450mm long at least. And you will do quite a bit of sheet work once you get going, guaranteed!

    Jeff

  12. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Near Bodgy, AlexS, Wongo & CraigB
    Age
    18
    Posts
    2,666

    Default

    the hammer is a far better constructed unit. you'll find the main differences in quality of construction, finish and tolerences.
    Zed

  13. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    686

    Default

    Should add, there's nothing wrong with the Hammer machine. No, it's not a trade quality machine (I prefer Altendorf,) but neither's the SCM MiniMax machine that I use at home. Just means that you need to take a bit more setting up and making the cuts.

    Cheers,

    eddie

Similar Threads

  1. GMC saws vs. Jepson saws
    By craig.robinson in forum HAND TOOLS - POWERED
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10th February 2020, 10:22 PM
  2. New Jet combination
    By knucklehead in forum TABLE SAWS & COMBINATIONS
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 24th May 2007, 01:58 PM
  3. Table Saws vs Radial Arm Saws
    By RIMP in forum TABLE SAWS & COMBINATIONS
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 14th March 2007, 05:22 PM
  4. Combination..........
    By ozwinner in forum WOODIES JOKES
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 4th December 2004, 07:36 AM
  5. Bad Combination
    By Dean in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH WOODWORK
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 30th July 2003, 10:55 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •