Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Parkside - South Australia
    Age
    46
    Posts
    3,320

    Default Pimping my 12" C.B. Rogers & Co. Jointer - Picture Heavy

    I entitled this tread pimping my jointer over restoring my jointer as it was in quite good working condition when I purchased it and as such I haven't really needed to restore it as much as just make it look fancy.

    Forum member, Issatree put me onto this jointer a number of years ago. It came out of a Geelong high school, and whilst it was in good working order I believe that they replaced it for OH&S issues to do with the older style lamb chop guard. It was originally three phase, and bloody heavy. After my pimping it is now single phase, and still bloody heavy.

    IMG_1309.jpg

    So after having this in my possession for I would say 3-4 years, and never actually having it running (due to not having access to three phase), and having moved it to three different houses (including an interstate move), this is what it was looking like. Minimal rust, everything moving freely, just not particularly bling worthy. So in no real particular order here are a few progress shots.

    The bearings seemed to be in good condition (not that I really know what to look for). I just gave them a clean and repacked. Two blade round cutter head.
    IMG_1876.jpg

    The tables were in fairly good shape with only minimal surface rust that was easy to remove.
    IMG_1872.jpg

    The fence was pulled apart and cleaned up ready for painting. Blades were removed and sharpened.
    IMG_1870.jpg IMG_1914.jpg

    Just an interesting detail of how the height of the infeed and outfeed tables rise and fall. After cleaning these up it is a very smooth action and makes adjustments and easy process. It also makes it possible to create a very small gap between the tables and the cutter head. I have been amazed at how small a piece of timber I can feed through without the fear of it falling into the gap between the table and the cutter head, which I though was going to be a real limiting factor by having such a big machine.
    IMG_1332.jpg IMG_1317.jpg IMG_1336.jpg

    It wasn't my intention to pull it all apart however it was much easier than I had thought it would be so I thought I may as well do it properly the first time. The tables were fairly hefty when removing.
    IMG_1888.jpg

    Starting to put it back together again.
    IMG_1896.jpg

    Detail of the name plate ready for painting and after painting.
    IMG_1891.jpg IMG_1913.jpg

    The original motor (3HP 3Ph) was replaced with a new 3HP single phase. I was a little concerned that it wouldn't be able to handle the 12" but no problems so far.
    IMG_1999.jpg

    Not yet fully completed but ready for its first run. A fairly wide bit of walnut - wow it just took it in its stride without even slowing the motor. I was a little worried just how noisy that it would be as in the past using similar sized 3ph machines they would really scream. Well this one with the new single phase motor is surprisingly quite and makes less noise than the dust extractor (as you has see in the photos I need to work on the dust collection!).

    IMG_1996.jpg

    IMG_1995.jpg

    IMG_1994.jpg

    Still to go will be mounting the starter, fitting a larger off button, a new guard for the belt (despite restoring the old one it doesn't fit with the new motor) and sorting out the dust extraction. All of which are fairly easy, and given the machine is now up and running it can wait another three years.

    Thanks for looking. If you are interested in more photos I have set up an album as I took a lot of photos during the strip down in case I couldn't work out how to get it together again - https://www.woodworkforums.com/member...ng-12-jointer/

    Cheers

    Stinky.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Now proudly sponsored by Binford Tools. Be sure to check out the Binford 6100 - available now at any good tool retailer.

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    FenceFurniture's Avatar
    FenceFurniture is offline The prize lies beneath - hidden in full view
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    1017m up in Katoomba, NSW
    Posts
    10,676

    Default

    Good job Stinky, well done indeed! They may have had OH&S issues with the lack of dust control, and more particularly with the exposed belts that would take a hand off in a flash.
    Regards, FenceFurniture

    COLT DRILLS GROUP BUY
    Jan-Feb 2019 Click to send me an email

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Millmerran,QLD
    Age
    73
    Posts
    11,171

    Default

    Sir Stinky

    Well done. Those old jointers are amazing machines and well worth the effort. Thanks for posting the pix.

    Regards
    Paul
    Bushmiller;

    "Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"

  5. #4
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    BELL POST HILL, 3215
    Age
    87
    Posts
    2,332

    Default The Rogers.

    Hi Michael,
    That sure was a nice job you did on that Planer, & yes, I remember just how heavy it was getting it out of The Geelong College.
    As I recall, we all guessed wrong on the Weight of it. We thought it wood have been about 750 - 850 Kilos, but in fact it was well over The Tonne.
    Photos of Young E were Great, Thank you.
    Regards,
    issatree.
    Have Lathe, Wood Travel.

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Newcastle NSW
    Posts
    775

    Default

    Stinky,

    Great job, looks like a hefty machine. I often use the word restoration with a lot of poetic license, and always wait for someone to correct me on it.

    Cheers,

    Camo

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia.
    Posts
    825

    Default

    Sir Stinkalot,

    This old girl is a long way from where it was made, and an early machine as well, C.B Rogers was one of the eleven makers that joined to form the American Wood Working Machinery Co in 1898.
    I think this would have to make your Jointer a late 1800's machine, that and the "wedge style" bed also shows this.
    It is definitely a rare machine even in America, so to own one in Australia is extraordinary.

    Thank you for showing such a beautifully restored machine, American machines like that are a real treat for me !!

    Melbourne Matty.

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    blue mountains
    Posts
    4,904

    Default

    A really impressive machine. Well worth the TLC.
    Regards
    John

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Parkside - South Australia
    Age
    46
    Posts
    3,320

    Default

    Thank you all for the positive feedback.

    Quote Originally Posted by FenceFurniture View Post
    They may have had OH&S issues with the lack of dust control, and more particularly with the exposed belts that would take a hand off in a flash.
    To be fair they did have a guard fabricated for the belts. It was a combination of timber and sheet metal and I took the effort of sanding back the timber and giving it a paint of coat, it was looking really good and I was looking forward to putting it back on. Unfortunately with the new motor it doesn't fit. Whilst I am the only one ever in my shop I still plan on making up a new belt guard to be safe. The dust control on the other hand was a little lacking. The sheet metal they fabricated does help direct the shavings out of the machine body but again I would like to improve this.I had purchased a big boy dust hood that I was hoping may fit up into the machine but it doesn't quite work so I will need to look at another option.

    Quote Originally Posted by issatree View Post
    As I recall, we all guessed wrong on the Weight of it. We thought it wood have been about 750 - 850 Kilos, but in fact it was well over The Tonne.
    Yep ..... the removalist company that dragged it over here to Adelaide arranged for a separate crane truck to drop it off. When the guy was swinging it off he mentioned that it weighed 1.2t. Whilst I am not 100% certain that it would be that heavy it is the best I have to work on. Taking off the old motor has helped reduce the weight somewhat. I am now experienced at lifting and moving it and during the last move I did it all single handled with just the engine hoist and a trailer!


    Quote Originally Posted by L.S.Barker1970 View Post
    This old girl is a long way from where it was made, and an early machine as well, C.B Rogers was one of the eleven makers that joined to form the American Wood Working Machinery Co in 1898.
    I think this would have to make your Jointer a late 1800's machine, that and the "wedge style" bed also shows this.
    It is definitely a rare machine even in America, so to own one in Australia is extraordinary.
    Shortly after posting on here I also posted on Vintage Machinery .org. Given that I had used this resource earlier to try and get some information on its history I thought it only fitting to put the information that I had up in case somebody else was trying to search for something similar in the future. The site makes mention of C.B. Rogers and the merger with the American Wood Working Machinery Co. The other examples of C.B. Rogers jointers are similar but mine does not have the small access door in the base of the machine. The wedge style bed seemed to be very common with C.B. Rogers, however the bases used when it was merged with AWWM seem to have changed, which would lead me to believe that mine was manufactured prior to the merge.

    Within moments of posting on VM I got the following email from one of their members who was able to provide a little more detail on the machines history. I will post it here with his consent:

    "Michael--

    I've just seen your jointer here on vmdotorg--to which I've been a long time contributor--and like it very well. You asked for some history, you do know you can look up Rodgers on this site, don't you? Made in Connecticutt, a really well known, very early firm, absorbed in 1897 into a large consolidated firm.

    On the vmdotorg site, under Rodgers, you can a similar see one of these I submittred a few years ago. I used this jointer in a shop I worked in in the 1970's. Here is the link to that:

    Photo Index - C. B. Rogers & Co. - Jointer labeled both 'American' & 'C.B. Rogers' | VintageMachinery.org

    Yours isn't marked 'AMerican' in any way?

    I suspect yours has had a nice cutterhead and bearing update as the rpound hound was not used until after Rodgers shut down and was absorbed into American. I think though I can't rewally tell, that your machine also has ball bearings, which, like the round cutterhead, would have been used later than the Rodghers name.

    I'm quite certain that a look at American Wood Working Machinery early catalogs (there are many) on this site would show this jointer by name.

    Best, and thanks,

    Robert Bernstein
    Bristol, Vermont"
    Now proudly sponsored by Binford Tools. Be sure to check out the Binford 6100 - available now at any good tool retailer.

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Coffs Harbour
    Posts
    226

    Default

    Nice work

    It's good to see an old machine get a new lease on life.
    Even better when you get a history lesson to go with it.

    Cheers

    Andrew

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia.
    Posts
    825

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sir Stinkalot View Post
    Shortly after posting on here I also posted on Vintage Machinery .org. Given that I had used this resource earlier to try and get some information on its history I thought it only fitting to put the information that I had up in case somebody else was trying to search for something similar in the future. The site makes mention of C.B. Rogers and the merger with the American Wood Working Machinery Co. The other examples of C.B. Rogers jointers are similar but mine does not have the small access door in the base of the machine. The wedge style bed seemed to be very common with C.B. Rogers, however the bases used when it was merged with AWWM seem to have changed, which would lead me to believe that mine was manufactured prior to the merge.

    Within moments of posting on VM I got the following email from one of their members who was able to provide a little more detail on the machines history.
    Micheal,
    I did have a bit to do with vintage machinery for a few years, and also some correspondence with Robert Bernstein in regard to history and Woodworking machinery Catalogs, he is an absolute Gentleman, and very knowledgeable on the subject of early history of American machinery.
    Looking on the C.B.Rogers section at Vintage machinery, this jointer looks very similar to your Machine.

    Photo Index - C. B. Rogers & Co. - Jointer | VintageMachinery.org

    As for Catalog cuts, I do have some very early C.B.Rogers material, but Vintage Machinery has a closer 1888 General line catalogs and page 12 looks similar to your jointer also, and is worth a look.

    C. B. Rogers & Co. - Publication Reprints - C.B. Rogers & Company Wood Working Machinery | VintageMachinery.org

    The 1898 American Wood Working Machinery Catalog I have in front of me shows only jointers by Rowley & Hermance, Williamsport Machine Co, and F. H. Clement.
    No sigh of a C.B. Rogers machine.

    Melbourne Matty.

Similar Threads

  1. Monster Truck - Picture Heavy.
    By Sir Stinkalot in forum TOY MAKING
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 25th April 2013, 02:47 PM
  2. Replies: 40
    Last Post: 9th April 2013, 11:15 PM
  3. WIP - Redgum Bandsaw Box (Picture Heavy)
    By Sir Stinkalot in forum BANDSAWN BOXES
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 15th December 2011, 11:20 PM
  4. Rodgers Lathe Spares?
    By neksmerj in forum METALWORK FORUM
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 3rd December 2007, 05:11 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •