Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 1 to 15 of 15
Thread: Help with new bandsaw
-
18th June 2007, 03:52 PM #1Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Canberra
- Age
- 63
- Posts
- 291
Help with new bandsaw
Hi all,
I bought myself a 14" Universal Sherwood bandsaw (MJ-3435-W) from Timbecon, arrived a couple of weeks ago in parts - lots of parts (ho hum) - along with a Manual that was "interesting" to say the least. I spent 2 weekends putting it together - I can honestly say that my childhood tinkering with an old meccano set came in handy, plus a bit of messing around with old computers. If I had to rely on the instruction manual I would be sending the whole lot back to Timbecon.
It is assembled and did start nicely, tracked ok, and I did make a couple of cuts as a test, everything seems ok, but I’m wondering if I have everything together the right way. I've been reading the bandsaw threads for a while now and I realise the machine itself is not that complicated, but I do have a few questions.
1. The upper guard has the double front wheels at the bottom and the single rear wheel at the back as in the picture – the blade runs in front of the rear wheel and between the two lower wheels. I set the lower guard up the same way – is this correct or is the lower guard supposed to be the other way up – or does it matter?
2. I’ve read on some threads that the wheels need to be adjusted so they ‘just touch’ the blade – both rear wheels spin when the motor is running, so I guess they are ok, but on both guides only one of the double wheels spins while the motor is running – is this ok? or should I be adjusting both wheels so they just touch the blade and both spin?
3. The upper guard has a long shaft to allow for sliding up and down (I guess to lower the guard to just above the workpiece), the three guide wheels, and a large, curved metal shield that looks like it should help with the blade tracking. The picture appears to show this shield outside the top case, but it seems to fit better if it is inserted inside the case – and seems logically to belong inside. Does this sound reasonable?
4. The ad said the item is tested before shipping so there is little vibration when running. I’ve got everything bolted together firmly as per the diagrams (at least the ones I can recognise). But when I turn the motor on it bounces up and down like a jelly – not violently, but consistently. I’ve not used anything with belts before, at least not with 2 opposing belts, so I don’t know if this is normal – any advice would be appreciated.
5. This saw is a 4-speed model – the motor has 4 different sized pulleys, the lower bandsaw tracking wheel has a single pulley, and the interim pulley has a single to match the lower wheel and 4 others to match the motor in alternate sizes (ie smallest to biggest, second-smallest to second-biggest, etc) – I understand this gives me the 4 different speeds and can work out theoretically which combination is fastest and slowest (mostly by comparing it to my 21-speed bicycle). But the only ways to change speeds seem to be either use a screwdriver or other tool to ‘slip’ the belt out of one of the pulleys (very hard to do) and on to another set, or undo the four bolts holding the motor at the correct position to release the belt tension, move the belt, retension the motor and do up the bolts. I know this is a fairly inexpensive bandsaw, but I can’t believe these are the only options. Is there a better way to change the belt arrangement?
Well, I think that will do for the moment – I have tried to make the questions as plain as possible – and I do appreciate any assistance as I’m really out of my depth.
Cheers,
Chumley
-
18th June 2007 03:52 PM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Age
- 2010
- Posts
- Many
-
18th June 2007, 11:24 PM #2
Chumley
Not want to confuse you with an overload of information a good starting point to answer your question is Setting Up a Bandsaw by Les Swift, Peninsular Woodturning Guild Inc. http://home.vicnet.net.au/~pwguild/i-bndsaw.htm
After that you may wish to try one or more of the sites listed here ~ Bandsaws and Blades information sites
I hope this helps,
Tony Ward
Now a power carver and living the dream.
-
19th June 2007, 03:32 PM #3Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Canberra
- Age
- 63
- Posts
- 291
Hi Tony,
Thanks for the info - the Les Swift site answered the question about the guides - good pictures are very handy. The other sites I have seen before (and printed off some hints to use). I think I figured out question 3 - the guard should be outside and slides up and down to protect me from the blade when the guard is lowered. The vibration is only in the motor, not the blade, so no real problem there (unless it vibrates the bolts loose). Question 1 and 5 I still need help with - probably need to find someone with a multi-speed saw and chat.
Thanks again,
Cheers,
Chumley
-
19th June 2007, 06:00 PM #4Hewer of wood
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Location
- Melbourne, Aus.
- Age
- 71
- Posts
- 12,746
Chumley, from an amateur with only one speed on the bandsaw, I'd say yes to 1., and maybe to 5.
Re 5 I'm extrapolating from my drill press. If it's too hard to get the belt off by hand, I'd be wary of levering it off. Maybe you can hit a happy medium of tension on the belt by loosening it off enough to push it off with your thumb without it slipping in use.
Let us know how you go.Cheers, Ern
-
20th June 2007, 09:22 AM #5Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Canberra
- Age
- 63
- Posts
- 291
Hi Ern,
Thanks for your input. I think I'm happy with the orientation of the lower guide - seems to fit ok and works. Re the changing of belt speeds - I think I'm just going to leave it on the fastest speed and not change it at all. Most of the posts I've read suggest that the faster speeds are better for timber, and I can always adjust the rate of feed. Plus I know myself - I tend to not mess with things unless I have to. We have a floor-mounted computer-room A/C at work with a single pulley motor to drive the pump - we routinely change the belts with a screwdriver to remove the old and just wind the new one on -- thought this may work on the bandsaw, but it feels kinda different when you own the machine.
All I have to do now is learn how to coil the bands - I have instructions from an earlier post - spent half an hour and got it only once - I need to be able to demo the coiling so I can justify buying a new table saw and a drill press (don't worry about the connection here, there isn't one, just don't tell her).
Cheers,
Chumley
-
20th June 2007, 09:34 AM #6Hewer of wood
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Location
- Melbourne, Aus.
- Age
- 71
- Posts
- 12,746
Goodo. Just concerned about stretching/breaking which I just did to two thicknesser drive feed tyres.
Re coiling, there's a torrent on the Video forum showing Stuart doing it. Picture is worth a thousand words ;-} (Can only load with Azureus btw.).Cheers, Ern
-
20th June 2007, 12:48 PM #7
Can't see videos on this dumb ol' compu-duh-r, but this is how I coil bandsaw blades: Wear gloves. Hold the blade in air with the teeth away from you; right hand at 2 o'clock, thumb toward noon; left hand at 10 o'clock, thumb toward 9 o'clock. Rotate both wrists the only way they'll go. Also works on large v-belts.
Regarding the speed change: Prying the belt from the grooves will shorten belt life. My drill press has the motor mounted to two round shafts, sliding fore and aft, position locked by bent bolts acting as grub screws. Loosen the bolts approx 1/4 turn to move the motor and allow belt relocation. Having to loosen four motor bolts for belt relocation sounds like a poor solution. Any possibility of doing the same on the jack shaft instead? On the other hand, speed change on a bandsaw is usually less frequent than on a drill press, so maybe not so bad. Have you spoken with anyone at the supplier about this? Another thought: If other elements allow, consider replacing the motor mount bolts with bent bolts for quicker engagement and disengagement. If just ordinary through bolts with nuts, invert and replace nuts with wing nuts.
JoeOf course truth is stranger than fiction.
Fiction has to make sense. - Mark Twain
-
20th June 2007, 04:42 PM #8
There's a lot to be said for the old "mount it on a hinged plate and let gravity do the tensioning" method. However, it seems to be a rarity on new machines... I wonder why? Did some do-gooder polly decide it was unsafe?
- Andy Mc
-
20th June 2007, 07:14 PM #9GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Adelaide
- Posts
- 2,794
Apart the fact that it might not be a practical option for the drill press, one reason could be that electric motor technology has substantially reduced the weight to power ratio over the past 50 years, so modern motors might not have enough weight to ensure sufficient tensioning.
-
21st June 2007, 12:15 AM #10
I've never been an enthusiast for letting the motor provide the tension, unless the arrangement can be locked in position once tensioned. At critical belt lengths and speeds, a resonant standing wave can set up in the belt and increase vibration problems, so that the motor platform bounces.
JoeOf course truth is stranger than fiction.
Fiction has to make sense. - Mark Twain
-
21st June 2007, 12:51 PM #11Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Canberra
- Age
- 63
- Posts
- 291
Hi Joe,
Not sure what a jack shaft is, presume its the pulley that sits half way between the motor and the bandwheel (?), if so, its locked into place with one belt going up to the bandwheel and the other going down to the motor. The motor itself (which is bleedin' heavy by the way) is mounted on a series of plates in the base of the stand - and I don't know about resonant waves, but I doubt it could vibrate any more than it does, although it does vibrate smoothly if you know what I mean. The bolts are thru bolts with nuts and heads, so you need two hands to loosen or tighten them - add to this the need to straighten out the motor angle when you tighten it up means I don't want to be doing this on and off. To install it I had to rig up a jig to hold the back of the motor up while pushing down on the other side with my elbow while holding the spanner on the bolt with one hand and doing up the nut with the other. You get the picture. The more I think about it the more certain I am of just leaving the belts as is and using the one speed. I'll ask around at work to see if some friendly tech will drop in for a coffee and give it a look - I always get confused with how tight to do nuts up and which side of the flat washer the split washer goes, etc. Didn't ever matter with my meccano set and the helicopter blades did twirl but this is a bit more complex and expensive.
Cheers,
Chumley
-
21st June 2007, 03:09 PM #12
Right, Chumley, the jack shaft is an intermediate shaft; usually used to introduce another speed factor or to realign the drive path. I get the picture about needing about five hands and an extra knee or two to make the connections. With bolt heads on the far side of the adjusting plate, you can "marry" adjacent bolt head pairs with a piece of sheet metal, about 1mm thick, in sort of a dog bone shape, holes for the bolt shanks, and tabs bent over the edges of the heads from the shank side. These function like little spanners, and will keep the bolts from turning while you turn the fastening nuts. I don't quite understand the part about pushing down with the elbow, but maybe the cartoon is applicable. [Split washer should go between the nut and the item attached - no flat washer, as it would defeat the purpose of the split washer.]
JoeLast edited by joe greiner; 21st June 2007 at 03:14 PM. Reason: [added]
Of course truth is stranger than fiction.
Fiction has to make sense. - Mark Twain
-
21st June 2007, 06:05 PM #13Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Canberra
- Age
- 63
- Posts
- 291
Hi Joe,
You're good value - thanks for the tips - I like the sheet metal helper. One problem I might have is that the bolt holes on the motor are so close to the motor housing that I couldn't feed the bolt thru from that side, so I have the nut on the motor side - can't see that from the back of the base stand as the motor is in the way -- it's hard to explain but is a pain of a setup. I think your idea will still work with the nuts - guess it doesn't matter which one you hold and which you turn.
The deal with the elbow (and I wasn't exaggerating) is that with the motor sitting roughly in place with the four bolts almost done up but still allowing some up and down movement, I needed to straighten the motor as it is lighter on the pulley side than the other (so the heavy side had the wooden frame holding the motor up) - the other end of the motor has the pulley and needed to be pulled down to both straighten the motor so the pulleys align properly and to give a bit of tension on the belt.
If only my son was interested in woodworking instead of computer games!
Cheers,
Chumley
-
21st June 2007, 11:43 PM #14
Aha! Got it with the elbow thing. With tension on the pulley, the motor weight throws the pulley out of plumb and twists the belt - NG.
Beg to differ about feasibility of the bolt placement. Timbecon says 3/4 HP motor. That would likely have a NEMA 48 or 56 frame. I agree the bolt holes are "under" the motor, and bolts can't be placed directly. But if you remove the motor, the bolts can be maneuvered into the holes and then rotated to square with the mounting flange. Bind loose parts with sacrificial masking tape, then push the whole thing into alignment with the frame plate for attachment.
The sheet metal thing is usually used as a locking flange on engines and such. Works somewhat like an external version of a castle nut with cotter pin. If the bolts are placed as I suggest, the sheet metal should be more of a "U" shape to straddle the buttress on the motor frame. (Set horizontally vs vertically as in my cartoon.) Then the nuts or wing nuts are operated upon from the back of the frame plate.
Short of adding some sort of side rails or auxiliary hinged plate to keep the motor shaft level, wrestling with it is probably inevitable. But as said earlier, speed change is less frequent with a bandsaw.
JoeOf course truth is stranger than fiction.
Fiction has to make sense. - Mark Twain
-
20th July 2007, 09:37 AM #15Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Canberra
- Age
- 63
- Posts
- 291
Hi Joe,
Said you were good value - bandsaw is humming and I feel much more comfortable playing with it - now I know what a greenie is, one is on its way!! Woohoo!
Cheers,
Chumley
Similar Threads
-
Bandsaw speeds
By HappyHammer in forum BANDSAWSReplies: 5Last Post: 13th November 2012, 08:54 AM -
Jet or Carbi-tech bandsaw
By Paul B in forum BANDSAWSReplies: 18Last Post: 20th October 2005, 11:54 PM -
Bandsaw and Lathe Purchase - Urgent Help Required
By CameronPotter in forum BANDSAWSReplies: 7Last Post: 8th September 2005, 10:47 AM -
Lessons (not so serious) in Bandsaw Buying
By paul.cleary in forum BANDSAWSReplies: 1Last Post: 4th December 2004, 12:39 PM -
Bandsaw Blade Tension
By DPB in forum BANDSAWSReplies: 2Last Post: 16th May 2003, 03:58 PM