Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 31
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Victoria
    Posts
    5,513

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Termite
    I'ts a bit hard to throw an M1A1 over your shoulder, they weigh about 70 ton, yes old ton. An M1A1 is an Abrahms Tank.
    True....but it's got a gas turbine for an engine - how cool is that!
    "Clear, Ease Springs"
    www.Stu's Shed.com


  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    willagee wa (near Freo)
    Age
    60
    Posts
    248

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shedhand
    S'ok Termite. Black1 is a bit confused. A sandgroper supporting croweaters...
    actually a croweater in exile in the west
    and a strong one at that. 70 ton no worrys mate.
    First On Race Day



    And the first brock trophy goes to...............
    and we got no "2" as well
    A FORD driver.

    ironic isnt it?

    and if ya cant win on ya own merit punt em off!!!
    holden cheater team!!!!!

  4. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Gorokan Central Coast NSW
    Age
    79
    Posts
    2,765

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by black1
    actually a croweater in exile in the west
    and a strong one at that. 70 ton no worrys mate.
    Great, well throw your M1A1 over your shoulder and go and visit Zed, he's having trouble with a possum.

  5. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    185

    Default

    spent 4 years using the steyr, I found it great, only ever carried the slr with blanks, I tell you what, you can have it. Big bloody thing it was. I think it was mentioned earlier but the SS109 has the same punch as the 7.62, it has tungsten rod in the head that causes it to tumble and stay in the body effectively turning it into mush or so was told by an NCO at singleton. We used it out to 600m, never had any troubles with it in training. we should have gone with the m16a2 when we changed over.

  6. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    West Gippsland, Vic
    Age
    72
    Posts
    4,608

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by black1
    actually a croweater in exile in the west
    and a strong one at that. 70 ton no worrys mate.
    I bet you barrack silently at Subi... lol.... Must be lonely (and dangerous) being the only crow tragic over there.
    Cheers
    go the HAWKS.
    If you never made a mistake, you never made anything!


  7. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    3,101

    Default

    SS109 has the same punch as the 7.62, it has tungsten rod in the head that causes it to tumble and stay in the body effectively turning it into mush or so was told by an NCO at singleton
    Yep, the round tumbles and breaks up, with the penetrator rod going one way and the jacket breaking up even further. You can get shot in the lower leg and the jacket will mush that part up and the penetrator ending up exiting somewhere weird like under your armpit. The penetrator seems to find the path of least resistance and often travels up arteries and veins, causing effective damage. The smaller and faster the round the more damage and shock it causes.
    Another reason the 5.56 mm round was brought in (and yes the 7.62 had real knockdown power) is that the 5.56mm is less likely to exit and cause damage to anyone else. Handy for UN style peacemaking missions i.e. shoot the baddie using the marketplace crowd as a shield, and you don't want to kill the next two people behind them. That would equal a manslaughter charge, and generally be bad for business with the locals perception of you.
    Also the Steyr is small and therefor good for urban ops and vehicle ops (actually the carbine version is more accurate as the rifling is most efficient over that barrel length) as well as jungle and close country fighting. A 7.62mm needs a longer barrel, so a longer weapon, therefor more unwieldly.
    Lastly IMO (again ) it is effective out to 600m, and thats too far away anyway. More, easily, accurate (funny term that) than using iron sights at 600m.
    Cheers,
    Clinton

    "Use your third eye" - Watson

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/clinton_findlay/

  8. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Lake Eacham, Atherton Tablelands
    Age
    50
    Posts
    359

    Default

    I dunno, I still like my old three-oh, must be all the wood on it maybe?

    Good for when you run out of ammo, you can use it as a club! Try that with plastic!

  9. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Gorokan Central Coast NSW
    Age
    79
    Posts
    2,765

    Default

    Both the 5.56 and the 7.62 have their advantages/disadvantages. The velocity of the 5.56 has massive stopping power with less chance of collateral damage, but due to its velocity it is less effective in a bushy situation due to the fact that it can self destruct on impact with a very small shrub, where the lower velocity 7.62 will punch on through. Personally I wouldn't like to be on the receiving end of either, it's not pretty.

  10. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Toowoomba Qld.
    Age
    65
    Posts
    2,792

    Default

    I used to shoot the SLR in the RAAF back in the '80's. Always found the recoil hard to handle but I was a scrawny thing back then!
    Wasn't there an L2A1, or L2A2, a beefed up automatic version as well?
    Cheers,
    Andy Mac
    Change is inevitable, growth is optional.

  11. #25
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Burnett Heads, QLD
    Age
    64
    Posts
    1,535

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andy Mac
    Wasn't here an L2A1, or L2A2, a beefed up automativ version as well.
    Yeah there was, with folding bipod legs, and a heavy barrel, they made 30 round magasines for it and i think the sights were different too

  12. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Brisbane
    Age
    61
    Posts
    1,055

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by doug the slug
    Yeah there was, with folding bipod legs, and a heavy barrel, they made 30 round magasines for it and i think the sights were different too
    It was called the AR and it had a barrel 5kg heavier than a SLR and a bit longer IIRC. It was a real bitch of a thing to carry at 15kg, especially trying to do fire and movement.
    Cheers,
    Craig

  13. #27
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Ipswich QLD
    Age
    55
    Posts
    1,166

    Post Slr.

    Stillthe L2A1 was a good weapon as it provided the section with a back up auto matic capability. It was normally issued to tail end charlie as his weapon of responsibility. Now with the F88 it gives more fire power though all members having automatic fire. Having experienced the use of all section weapons over the years the F88 does have its place. The m16m4 is now being issied to spec ops units as preference. I must admit though I like 7.62 as a section weapon in the form of the M60. Its stopping power is 2nd to none. With the F88 a 203 grenade launcher can be fitted as well to give a harder hitting force when in contact. My thoughts only and no I wouldn't like to be on the receiving end of either of them.
    Dave,
    hug the tree before you start the chainsaw.

  14. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Dewhurst, SE Melbourne
    Age
    51
    Posts
    269

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andy Mac
    I used to shoot the SLR in the RAAF back in the '80's. Always found the recoil hard to handle but I was a scrawny thing back then!
    Wasn't there an L2A1, or L2A2, a beefed up automatic version as well?
    Cheers,
    Had to make sure the stock was the right size (length) too. Did the Aussie SLR have auto? British ones didn't, there were stories of people putting matchsticks in the sears to convert them temporarily.
    Blokes in the Falklands were grabbing the Argy ones which were full auto.

  15. #29
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Gorokan Central Coast NSW
    Age
    79
    Posts
    2,765

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by havenoideaatall
    Had to make sure the stock was the right size (length) too. Did the Aussie SLR have auto? British ones didn't, there were stories of people putting matchsticks in the sears to convert them temporarily.
    Blokes in the Falklands were grabbing the Argy ones which were full auto.
    Back in '63 we had auto and semi-auto, initially the infantry got the full auto, and us Artillery types got the semi-auto. If you saw what we did with a 105 you would understand why.

  16. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    willagee wa (near Freo)
    Age
    60
    Posts
    248

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shedhand
    I bet you barrack silently at Subi... lol.... Must be lonely (and dangerous) being the only crow tragic over there.
    Cheers
    go the HAWKS.
    theres actually a crow supporters club over here! must be a lot of displaced croweaters over here lol
    First On Race Day



    And the first brock trophy goes to...............
    and we got no "2" as well
    A FORD driver.

    ironic isnt it?

    and if ya cant win on ya own merit punt em off!!!
    holden cheater team!!!!!

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. My Waterstone/Sharpening Board
    By Mirboo in forum HOMEMADE TOOLS AND JIGS ETC.
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 6th February 2006, 03:53 PM
  2. Triton, here I come.... I think...
    By Giesse in forum TRITON / GMC
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 27th May 2003, 08:52 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •