Results 151 to 165 of 168
Thread: A few old saws
-
13th January 2016, 09:17 PM #151
Pete
If you think a handle will fit go with it. The Seaton handle is iconic. You may be able to use the dimensions of the handle hole in my last post to see how much you can modify the size to give a respectable amount of plate below the handle.
Also we should take on board Stewie's suggestion to modify the heel of the saw plate if it causes too much trouble. After all, nobody uses that bit anyway.
Regards
PaulBushmiller;
"Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"
-
13th January 2016 09:17 PM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Age
- 2010
- Posts
- Many
-
13th January 2016, 09:27 PM #152
Thanks Paul, those photos are fine. I'll have a play with it tomorrow arvo and see if either of them will work. If we have to trim the saw plate, then that's what we'll do. It doesn't need a large grip hole, Dave's just a little guy
-
13th January 2016, 09:49 PM #153
If I use the Seaton Handle as a guide but take a bit off the top to push the grip hole up so that the base of the handle is clear of the tooth line, would that effect the performance or feel too much?
-
13th January 2016, 10:02 PM #154
-
13th January 2016, 10:39 PM #155
Pete
Dave is a carpenter. His hands will have developed. Did you ever read Sherlock Holmes. "has thick right wrist and smells of fish." = Ships carpenter. Not that I am suggesting Dave smells in any way untoward.
Your proposed modification of the handle sounds fine in principle: The angle of the handle in relation to the saw plate is more important to my mind.
Regards
PaulBushmiller;
"Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"
-
14th January 2016, 12:35 AM #156
GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Location
- Sydney
- Posts
- 1,504
As it is only a shallow blade, you might be better off going for a variation on a mitre box saw handle.
The handle will sit at a better height to the cutting edge. I'd just trim the blade to fit.
image.jpegimage.jpeg
-
14th January 2016, 07:53 AM #157
Pete, maybe you can just adjust the cheeks so they sit a bit lower relative to the grip? As long as you preserve the same angle of grip to tooth line, plus or minus a degree or two, all should be well. I'd be trying to re-draw the cheeks into a pleasing shape that comfortably incorporates the existing bolt holes. I can see you might have difficulties getting a shape that looks neat & fits with the slanted end of the saw, but it's worth a bit of doodling to see.
I wouldn't be fussing about creating very much 'clearance' unless the saw will regularly need to saw to a fixed point over some obstruction. These are used differently from backsaws. In most cases, the blade is fully enclosed by the wood being sawn, and the stroke is limited by the front of the handle, not the butt, so it doesn't matter if the handle projects below the tooth line for 99.9% of applications. By the same token, you don't want it too low or you tend to push the teeth away from the wood on the forward stroke..
When starting from scratch like this, I'd be making a mock-up out of a piece of scrap, and trying a few different handle placements, to see what looks & feels right....
Cheers,IW
-
31st January 2016, 12:54 PM #158
I haven't started the handle yet but I have cleaned up Dave's Dad's saw plate a bit.
Pete.
-
31st January 2016, 12:55 PM #159
Looks a vast improvement
Dave TTC
Turning Wood Into Art
-
31st January 2016, 01:13 PM #160
A few old saws
It was in reasonable condition.
I've been thinking about the handle a bit and have decided to stick to my original plan of making an identical handle as the original but from Black Walnut. I feel that, to turn the saw into something that it isn't, is moving away from the idea of restoring Dave's Dad's saw. It would become something else entirely and loose any memories and/or sentiment that it has for Dave.
Also, to change the handle design would probably mean cutting it at the handle end making it shorter than it already is.
Pete.
-
31st January 2016, 01:50 PM #161
Gentlemen, may I remind you that this is not Facebook or Twitter and therefore double-entendre posts are neither appreciated nor appropriate on this forum.
Three posts have been deleted, let's not turn this forum in to a "drivel" forum.
-
31st January 2016, 03:08 PM #162
Thanks Pete. I look forward to seeing how it comes up.
This one that both you and Simplicity worked on at the GTG is possibly the shortest backless saw I have used of its kind. Went to use it for some scribes but needs a couple of saw nuts for the handle. Is a little lose atm...
A baby up against the diston from Paul
Still working on a mod to my box so it will fit
Dave TTC
Turning Wood Into Art
-
31st January 2016, 03:16 PM #163
Did you ask Paul if he could ID that other saw?
Dave TTC
Turning Wood Into Art
-
31st January 2016, 09:43 PM #164
I put it to him on the gtg thread but I think he may have missed it.
-
31st January 2016, 10:38 PM #165Bushmiller;
"Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"
Similar Threads
-
GMC saws vs. Jepson saws
By craig.robinson in forum HAND TOOLS - POWEREDReplies: 7Last Post: 10th February 2020, 10:22 PM -
Bad Axe Saws
By SimonArchibald in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 8Last Post: 23rd April 2012, 04:16 PM -
Rip saws
By wattycoo in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 2Last Post: 13th November 2010, 12:06 PM -
Ian's Saws.
By Scribbly Gum in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 23Last Post: 18th December 2009, 08:55 AM -
Table Saws vs Radial Arm Saws
By RIMP in forum TABLE SAWS & COMBINATIONSReplies: 13Last Post: 14th March 2007, 05:22 PM